Corbyn slams new ‘establishment attack’, calling for ‘investigation into senior civil servants’

Jeremy Corbyn
Ed Sykes

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has slammed reported claims by senior civil servants that he’s “too frail” to be prime minister. The smear, he suggested, is the latest ‘establishment attack’ against a progressive Labour government-in-waiting. And he called for “a thorough and independent investigation” into the supposedly impartial civil service as a result:

 

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

In his letter to cabinet secretary Mark Sedwill, Corbyn said the civil servants’ comments in Rupert Murdoch’s Times were “based on false assumptions, should not be taking place, nor shared with a newspaper”. And he insisted:

For there to be trust in any investigation, there need to be assurances on its scope and independence.

For him, that meant:

a speedy and thorough independent investigation, rather than one carried out by the Cabinet Office.

Corbyn: ‘The rich and powerful are worried’

On 1 July, Corbyn had said of the latest establishment attack that:

The rich and powerful are so worried about a Labour government redistributing wealth and power that they’re stepping up their attacks on me, those close to me, my staff and our movement.

And he called for unity in the face of these attacks:

Labour MP Laura Pidcock agreed, stressing that the new attack suggested “a fear of the Labour agenda” among some senior civil servants.

According to the BBC, meanwhile, one former senior civil servant believed the smear did “more harm to the civil service” than to Corbyn.

Undemocratic, unconstitutional and unacceptable

Shadow cabinet office minister Jon Trickett was also damning in his critique of the Times smear. He called it an “undemocratic and unconstitutional public intervention”. And he argued that:

The professionalism and objectivity of our public servants has been admired, many throughout the world, and it’s a cornerstone of our democracy. But there must be no hesitation at all to condemn the kind of behaviour reported.

Both Corbyn and Trickett are right. Because the apparent intervention of senior civil servants – in league with odious mogul Murdoch – is utterly unacceptable. And to restore any sense of trust in civil service neutrality, we should expect nothing less than a thorough independent investigation.

We expect rich and powerful elites to do everything they can to stop Corbyn; because he’s the most progressive leader of a mainstream party in a very long time. But we should expect and demand so much better from our civil service.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Sophie Brown

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. It was always known the UK’s Civil Service was an extension of ‘the Tory Party disguised’ whatever government was in power. This disgraceful civil service slur upon HM’s opposition Labour leader needs to be thoroughly investigated. And, those complicit should face disciplinary action – if not the sack.

    2. If I am correct, and I might not be, wasn’t Mark Sidwell head of GCHQ or MI6 or one of the security agencies?

      If this is true then he is obviously the leak and should not be allowed any where near an independent investigation.

      The Establishment really are desperately afraid of a Corbyn victory aren’t they?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.