Corbyn slams new ‘establishment attack’, calling for ‘investigation into senior civil servants’

Jeremy Corbyn
Support us and go ad-free

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has slammed reported claims by senior civil servants that he’s “too frail” to be prime minister. The smear, he suggested, is the latest ‘establishment attack’ against a progressive Labour government-in-waiting. And he called for “a thorough and independent investigation” into the supposedly impartial civil service as a result:

 

Read on...

In his letter to cabinet secretary Mark Sedwill, Corbyn said the civil servants’ comments in Rupert Murdoch’s Times were “based on false assumptions, should not be taking place, nor shared with a newspaper”. And he insisted:

For there to be trust in any investigation, there need to be assurances on its scope and independence.

For him, that meant:

a speedy and thorough independent investigation, rather than one carried out by the Cabinet Office.

Corbyn: ‘The rich and powerful are worried’

On 1 July, Corbyn had said of the latest establishment attack that:

The rich and powerful are so worried about a Labour government redistributing wealth and power that they’re stepping up their attacks on me, those close to me, my staff and our movement.

And he called for unity in the face of these attacks:

Labour MP Laura Pidcock agreed, stressing that the new attack suggested “a fear of the Labour agenda” among some senior civil servants.

According to the BBC, meanwhile, one former senior civil servant believed the smear did “more harm to the civil service” than to Corbyn.

Undemocratic, unconstitutional and unacceptable

Shadow cabinet office minister Jon Trickett was also damning in his critique of the Times smear. He called it an “undemocratic and unconstitutional public intervention”. And he argued that:

The professionalism and objectivity of our public servants has been admired, many throughout the world, and it’s a cornerstone of our democracy. But there must be no hesitation at all to condemn the kind of behaviour reported.

Both Corbyn and Trickett are right. Because the apparent intervention of senior civil servants – in league with odious mogul Murdoch – is utterly unacceptable. And to restore any sense of trust in civil service neutrality, we should expect nothing less than a thorough independent investigation.

We expect rich and powerful elites to do everything they can to stop Corbyn; because he’s the most progressive leader of a mainstream party in a very long time. But we should expect and demand so much better from our civil service.

Featured image via Wikimedia – Sophie Brown

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. It was always known the UK’s Civil Service was an extension of ‘the Tory Party disguised’ whatever government was in power. This disgraceful civil service slur upon HM’s opposition Labour leader needs to be thoroughly investigated. And, those complicit should face disciplinary action – if not the sack.

    2. If I am correct, and I might not be, wasn’t Mark Sidwell head of GCHQ or MI6 or one of the security agencies?

      If this is true then he is obviously the leak and should not be allowed any where near an independent investigation.

      The Establishment really are desperately afraid of a Corbyn victory aren’t they?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.