According to the Times, Boris Johnson is plotting an early election if he becomes PM:
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) July 16, 2019
Although it’s presented as a plan to take advantage of Labour’s current “state”, many of Labour’s supporters are actually incredibly up for it.
“Labour in no fit state”
In an article titled Boris Johnson plans early election to hit Corbyn, the Times writes:
Mr Johnson has made clear that holding an election before Brexit has been delivered would be an “absolute folly”. Senior allies said, however, that planning was under way to go to the polls by the summer of next year.
Members of Mr Johnson’s team are concerned that getting legislation through parliament with a majority of three, as is expected after a by-election next month, could prove impossible.
[Sir Edward Lister]’s team is said to be preparing for a general election either being forced on the party in a vote of no confidence or Mr Johnson having to call a snap election once Brexit was delivered.
One senior member of Mr Johnson’s team told The Times: “There’s a desire to get this done while Corbyn is still around. Labour is utterly divided — Brexit is killing them. Labour is in no fit state to fight a general election.”
If this story pans out to be true, there are some problems with the logic of it.
For a start – Labour has been deeply divided since Corbyn first became leader. That didn’t stop his critics, if nothing else, working to make sure that they got themselves re-elected in 2017.
Despite the current divisions, Labour is still coming out on top in several polls. The average currently sees Labour at 24% and the Conservatives at 23%:
Survation – the most accurate pollster in the 2017 election – recently put Labour six points ahead:
NEW: General Election voting intention in England, Scotland and Wales, 10th – 11th July 2019:
LAB 29% (+3), CON 23% (-1), BXP 20% (nc), LD 19% (nc), SNP 4% (+1), GRN 3% (-2), OTH 2% (-1)
(changes w/ 19th – 20th June 2019) pic.twitter.com/yH12s5qPWv
— Survation. (@Survation) July 12, 2019
And speaking of the 2017 election, it’s worth remembering what happened there. Under Corbyn, Labour saw the biggest increase in vote share since 1945. The party went from 20 points behind to secure 40% of the vote. But how did it do this?
One important factor is that more stringent anti-bias practices restrict the media during an election. Reports showed a clear bias against Corbyn before the 2017 election. Media guidelines during the election meant the two main parties fought on a more equal footing. This worked in Labour’s favour. It turned out that when the party’s policies were presented to the public, they proved incredibly popular.
It’s unclear what the Conservatives under Johnson will offer to counter Labour’s policies. It is clear that since the narrow Conservative victory in 2017, conditions for many Britons have only worsened.
Factoring in the above, many people are excited about the prospects of an early chance to ditch the Conservatives:
Boris Johnson wants to call an early General Election does he? Let's do this. pic.twitter.com/QMWfnOiBEK
— Ollie 🌹🌱💚 #lauraisourdeputy (@Ollie4TheMany) July 16, 2019
Murdoch’s Times are claiming their man Boris Johnson plans to call a snap general election to ‘finish Corbyn off’.
The last person that tried this is picking up her P45 next week.
Bring it on. We will win.
— Rachael Swindon #EL4C (@Rachael_Swindon) July 17, 2019
Boris Johnson plans to call a general election if he becomes Prime Minister to ‘crush’ Jeremy Corbyn
Let me remind you at the 2017 election, Labour reduced his majority in Uxbridge and South Ruislip from 10,695 to 5,034 after the party increased its vote by 13%
The fight is on pic.twitter.com/aX0Eu5SaJF
— Socialist Voice 🌐 (@SocialistVoice) July 17, 2019
— iliad (@iliad1orig) July 16, 2019
Bring it on
In 2017, Labour got to 40% after starting 20 points behind. If Johnson called an election tomorrow, Labour would start its campaign in the lead.
It’s easy to see why many people fancy Labour’s chances.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?