The latest no-deal Brexit propaganda is a spin too far

On 13 August, the Telegraph front page claimed that the public backs Boris Johnson “to shut down Parliament” and force Brexit through. Only it turns out this is pure propaganda.
TELEGRAPH; ‘Public backs Johnson to shut down Parliament for Brexit’ #tomorrowspaperstoday pic.twitter.com/KZG8vG7QjQ
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) August 12, 2019
Deal or no-deal
According to the Telegraph, an exclusive poll from ComRes showed that Johnson:
has the support of more than half of the public to deliver Brexit by any means, including suspending Parliament…
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeThe ComRes survey for The Telegraph found that 54 per cent of British adults think Parliament should be prorogued to prevent MPs stopping a no-deal Brexit.
It presented this result as very straightforward:
54 per cent of British adults think Parliament should be prorogued to prevent MPs stopping a no-deal Brexit | @CamillaTominey @christopherhope @HarryYorke1 https://t.co/X53CfiTyfe pic.twitter.com/cmGjNCVBdS
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) August 13, 2019
But, according to the poll itself, 54% of people surveyed didn’t actually say this. When asked to “agree” or “disagree” with the statement:
Boris needs to deliver Brexit by any means, including suspending parliament if necessary, in order to prevent MPs from stopping it.
Only 44% of those surveyed actually agreed. 37% disagreed, while 19% answered “Don’t know”.
So, many people criticised not only the Telegraph‘s twisted interpretation of this result but also the wording of the question:
Shocking misreporting of this Tel/Comres poll. Front page headline claims 54% support for shutting down Parliament. Poll detail results says figure is 44% in response to highly tendentiously worded question… https://t.co/7vs6aUAR2z pic.twitter.com/AyJ14sqlCc
— Alan Travis (@alantravis40) August 12, 2019
This poll does not show that "54% of British adults" support prorogation. Utterly dire survey question, utterly dire reporting. pic.twitter.com/ppWBGvUwZp
— Will Jennings (@drjennings) August 12, 2019
Numberwang
Saying “less than half” really wouldn’t make for a strong front page. So, it seems, the Telegraph removed the 19% who answered “don’t know”, did some maths, and hey presto. Pure propaganda.
They are excluding the Don't Knows then adding the Agrees & Disagrees. 44 + 37 = 81. 44 is 54% of 81. Quite appalling!
— James Wood #RevokeArticle50 🇪🇺🇫🇷🇬🇧 (@JamesRDWood) August 13, 2019
In other words, 878 people agreed with the statement, which is 43.7% of the total sample. But, by excluding the 19% who “didn’t know”, this equals 53.9% of the total “agree” or “disagree” responses.
So when the Telegraph claimed:
The poll suggested the Prime Minister is more in tune with the public’s views on Brexit than MPs, following his promise to deliver Brexit by October 31 “do or die”.
It was talking utter, manipulative tosh.
Not sure why remainers are finding the ComRes poll by the Telegraph so surprising. It's certainly not the first or last time a newspaper will manipulate poll data to push their agenda.
— James Page (@JPage471) August 13, 2019
Shameful twisting of the results of the ComRes survey by @Telegraph this morning. "54% of adults support proroguing Parliament" is actually "44% of respondents support delivering Brexit by means *including* proroguing Parliament", in a sample where 45% of respondents voted Leave.
— Graham Harper (@harper84) August 13, 2019
And several people suggested that the way the whole poll was constructed needs further investigation:
What is most shocking about today's @ComRes poll is the long lead-in of negative questions about trust in parliament/MPs before the question about Boris Johnson suspending parliament. It is a poll that needs an immediate response from the @BritPollingCncl
— Paul Ilett, Author (@Paul_Ilett) August 13, 2019
When asked about the method behind the results, Camilla Tominey, one of the piece’s writers, claimed this was “standard practice”:
From ComRes: It certainly is standard practice (to exclude don’t knows) and perfectly reasonable as long as we are transparent about methodology- which we are. Tables are already on our website too…
— Camilla Tominey (@CamillaTominey) August 12, 2019
But an experienced Guardian journalist disagreed:
Thanks @camillatominey for responding on Tel/Comres poll. After more than a decade of reporting polls I know it is not standard practice to exclude 'don't knows' when reporting public opinion. Only valid for voting intentions when don't knows become don't votes. Correction? https://t.co/gA66Kfvb0B
— Alan Travis (@alantravis40) August 13, 2019
And as others noted, this poll is completely at odds with the result of a recent YouGov survey:
Here are the most recent YouGov results on proroguing Parliament, including @anthonyjwells heroic effort at writing a balanced survey question on a complicated topic.
Unfortunately, this never made it onto the front page of a newspaper. https://t.co/31lTAVazMw pic.twitter.com/qDg2OaRKDP
— Chris Curtis (@chriscurtis94) August 12, 2019
Propaganda
The Telegraph owners Frederick and David Barclay have backed the Leave mission since the 2016 referendum. As The Canary reported, new evidence links them straight to the murky connections of Leave.EU and key far-right figures.
Now, as Johnson’s right-wing government hurtles the UK towards a no-deal Brexit, the usual suspects are lining up to churn out pure propaganda. Perhaps we shouldn’t be shocked any longer, but it shows just what we’re up against.
Featured image via YouTube – Guardian News
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Parliament has already been shut down with inane dialogue so is this to be a respectable issue now the
” Abandoning of Parliament”
Must be simply a welfare idea this idea of democracy as it stands?
I doubt the Telegraph is even thinking of the consequences.
Too bad no can vote on the dissolution of the Telegraph with a Yes or No with the finality Brexit has.