The DWP is back in hot water after the UN slams its ‘total surveillance’

DWP logo and CCTV
Emily Apple

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has been slammed by the UN over its surveillance of benefit claimants. Philip Alston, the UN’s special rapporteur warned that the department is not just spying on those it suspects of fraudulent claims:

It’s not. It will soon affect everyone and leave the society much worse off. Everyone needs to pay attention and insist on decent limits.

Aston emphasised that the current system applies to everyone and that all claimants are:

screened for potential wrongdoing in a system of total surveillance.

Spying on protesters

As The Canary previously reported, Greater Manchester Police admitted that:

it has a written agreement to share information about disabled people and other activists who take part in protests with the [DWP].

Kevin Blowe, coordinator of the Network for Police Monitoring stated:

This is a really worrying development, that I think is entirely vindictive. The suggestion that anyone who… takes part in protest if they’re disabled is likely to be committing fraud – which is what’s implied by the police getting involved in this – is about trying to make sure that the effectiveness of protest is undermined.

Speaking to the Guardian, Rick Burgess from Manchester Disabled People Against Cuts asserted:

There are people who are not protesting today because they are terrified by what the DWP might know about them. The idea that information the police gather at protests about some of those taking part could be passed to the DWP for welfare fraud investigations is Stasi-like.

“A human rights emergency”

A 2018 report from Big Brother Watch described the surveillance of claimants as a “human rights emergency”. It set out the “brutal” surveillance regime the DWP operates:

Gym memberships, airport footage, job centres and surveillance video from public buildings are now used to build cases against claimants, with posts from social media used to suggest people are lying about their disabilities.

As Steve Topple previously reported for The Canary, the DWP is colluding with Sainsbury’s to spy on people. As Topple wrote:

The UK has a ‘hostile environment’ where welfare claimants and disabled people live under a cloud of suspicion and unworthiness. It’s this which makes Sainsbury’s colluding with the DWP all the more concerning. If we have reached the point where welfare recipients can’t even do their shopping without fear of being ‘shopped’ to the DWP, then the system is even more broken than we thought.

If in doubt, fudge

A spokesperson for the DWP told the Guardian:

The department does not request referrals from the police and there is no obligation on either the police or members of the public to provide referrals. In the event we receive information from the police, we consider it on its merits.

As is the case with any responsible government department, we stand ready to assist the police in the event they request information from us for the purpose of crime prevention or detection. This service is provided under the Data Protection Act for the purposes of preventing and detecting crime.

However, saying there’s “no obligation” is very different from admitting to arrangements that already exist – especially given Greater Manchester Police’s admission that such an arrangement is in place.

Big Brother is watching

Aston is right; it is vital that we “pay attention”. Those claiming benefits should not face routine surveillance. Disabled people wanting to protest should not be prevented from doing so because of fear of being reported to the DWP.

The reality of the surveillance state is starring us in the face. It’s very real and it needs to be stopped.

Featured image via Wikimedia – UK Government / Pexels/PhotoMIX Ltd

Get involved

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us