Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
John Humphrys started an interview with David Davis by ‘joking’ about domestic violence
On 22 August, John Humphrys interviewed former Brexit secretary David Davis on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. Humphrys is known for his chummy, laugh a minute interviews with Davis. But this time he took it to a new level. Because he seemed to start the interview by joking about domestic violence.
Oh, how we laughed about punching women
A dancer in the World Tango Championship has been disqualified after witnesses saw him punching his wife and dancing partner. The story was covered as the last news story before the interview with Davis.
Any rational thinking person would realise this is not something to joke about. But apparently not so for Humphrys and Davis. First, people noticed that Humphrys sniggered after the news bulletin. And then Davis started the interview by saying:
I guess this is our last tango.
Humphrys countered:
I promise not to punch you if you don’t punch me.
Davis replied:
Read on...
Ah, very good.
Unsurprisingly, people on social media were not impressed:
Is a woman being punched really a laughing and joking matter, @BBCr4today? Not only did John Humphries laugh at a story of a woman being punched at the end of the 8am bulletin he then shared a joke about punching with David Davis. Violence against women is not a joke. #endvaw
— Pip Green (@PipJGreen) August 22, 2019
Have @BBCRadio4 really just told a jokey news story about domestic violence?! With the awful #johnhumphrys and the foul #DavidDavies sniggering and adding their own jokes?! Ffffffffffssssss #radio4
— Sarah Moolla (@Sarah_SMoolla) August 22, 2019
Hi, absolutely, but the sniggering and jokes afterwards were by the presenters and then the banter was between John Humphrys and David Davis. It was appalling. They should meet women in refuges who can tell them how ‘funny’ it is (not) to be punched in the face by their partner.
— Danuta Kean #FBPE (@Danoosha) August 22, 2019
For some, it provided yet another reason why they’re switching off Radio 4:
John Humphrys and David Davis sharing chummy laughter about a woman being assaulted. After 25 years, it’s time to wave goodbye to #r4today
— Mick Collins (@MickPCollins) August 22, 2019
A cosy chat down the pub
Although it’s hard to get worse than laughing about domestic violence, the rest of the interview wasn’t exactly exemplary. As people pointed out, it was more like a “cosy chat” than a robust political interview:
John Humphrys sounds like he’s having a cosy chat with one of his friends when he interviews David Davis. No surprise Davis is a fan. #r4today
— Andrew Griffiths (@AndyPRG) August 22, 2019
John Humphrys interview with the equally clueless David Davis made for sickening listening. More like a couple of uninformed friends chatting over a pint in their local. This has to represent the nadir of the Today programme. #r4today
— Patrick May (@PatrickFMay) August 22, 2019
And one Twitter user summed up just how little anyone wants to listen to Davis:
I would listen to this interview with David Davis on #r4today right now, but I’ve been standing in this queue for 3 days just to stick my head in this cow’s arse and I don’t want to lose my place
— Roger Luckhurst (@TheProfRog) August 22, 2019
According to the Office for National Statistics, 2 million adults experienced domestic abuse in the UK in the year ending March 2018. As it also points out, it’s often a “hidden crime”. It’s not something to joke about at any time. But it’s especially not something we should expect an MP and our public service broadcaster to joke about.
Davis and Humphrys using the news of a man punching a woman for their chummy banter is utterly disgusting and shows both men are unfit to hold their positions in public life.
Featured image via screengrab/BBC Newsnight and Wikimedia/Chris McAndrew
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
Support us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Why bother to write at length about a foolish remark which even taken on its own terms lacked humour? Why extensive quotation of social media comment, what depth of analysis does this provide?
Are there not far more pressing matters a finely tuned mind writing for the Canary could discuss?