Referral of Vote Leave to Crown Prosecution Service couldn’t have come at a worse time for Johnson and Cummings

On 1 November, Open Democracy reported that the Met Police have referred the Vote Leave campaign to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for “early investigative advice”.
A source from the Home Office has said:
This EIA (early investigative advice) is effectively the Met asking the CPS what it needs to bring charges. It would not be doing this if it was not planning to deliver a full file of evidence on Vote Leave. It will of course be the CPSās decision on whether charges are brought.
Regardless of the outcome, the timing of these developments is less than ideal for the Conservatives. Since Boris Johnson and his advisor Dominic Cummings played a key role in the Vote Leave campaign:
Holy shit. I canāt believe it. The Metropolitan Police have passed on the evidence I and other whistleblowers provided against Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings & Vote Leave to the Crown Prosecution Service. This is huge. Thank you for your support & believing in us. https://t.co/xhAFznbNOH
— Shahmir Sanni (@shahmiruk) November 1, 2019
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
Journalist and campaigner Adam Ramsay has explained the timeline of events leading up to this latest development:
For us, this story began more than two years ago, when we got a tranche of Electoral Commission internal emails which revealed they had thought the Vote Leave/Darren Grimes relationship probably broke the rules. But they'd decided not to investigate: https://t.co/rPD8WouHA0
— Adam Ramsay š (@AdamRamsay) November 1, 2019
People are questioning why the party isn’t suspending Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, and Priti Patel among others until they have been cleared of all allegations:
This is so true. If you or I were under criminal investigation, weād be suspended.
But Boris Johnson? The former journalist has the media in such a stranglehold, itās hardly even REPORTED. https://t.co/BVZpMH3oar— Dr Louise Raw (@LouiseRawAuthor) November 2, 2019
Exactly so. Indeed any one involved in Cambridge Analytica scandal and Vote Leave fraud should be suspended and disallowed from this election campaign e.g Gove Cummings and Johnson for a start. https://t.co/9ROBvbXqmV
— pamela.sammons (@sammons_pamela) November 2, 2019
BBC bias
In the wake of these revelations, people have noticed that mainstream media outlets are surprisingly silent:
*PM FACES CPS INVESTIGATION*. WHERE IS THE MASS MEDIA COVERAGE?
Nothing from the BBC, ā¦@Telegraphā©, ā¦@guardianā©, ā¦@thetimesā©.Files were passed to CPS on 17 OCTOBER- WHY WAS IT NOT REVEALED UNTIL AFTER WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BREXIT DAY?
https://t.co/dkQgtQ9ppn— Dr Louise Raw (@LouiseRawAuthor) November 2, 2019
Nope.
I've searched on The BBC News website for…
CPS,
Crown Prosecution Service,
Police,
Boris,
Johnson,
Boris Johnson,
Prime minister
Vote leave,
Dominic Cummings, Evidance,It's not on any of the UK news web sites that i can see. Just news paper based
— š¬š§ šŖšŗšš· (@JobenMontana) November 2, 2019
Many have criticised the BBC’s role in particular. Especially since Fiona Bruce told an audience member who raised the issue on Question Time that the Vote Leave campaign was cleared of charges:
On the most serious electoral fraud in modern times, the BBC – having suppressed coverage in the first place – continues to deceive the public.
Vote Leave was found GUILTY of overspending
Met Police are STILL investigatingHow can you get something so important so wrong? https://t.co/fOqw2FIlQW
— Peter Jukes (@peterjukes) November 1, 2019
Why did Fiona Bruce slap down the woman who said UK will struggle to have a free+fair election as Vote Leave broke electoral law and Johnson adviser Dominic Cummings is in contempt of parliament? Both claims are 100% true. Bruce owes her an apology #bbcqt https://t.co/FxMh5QrPoo
— Ian Fraser (@Ian_Fraser) October 31, 2019
Moreover, campaigners have accused the BBC of actively covering up reporting on the issue to begin with:
Reminiscent of how @AndrewMarr9 invited Oakeshott on to counter my evidence yet never reached out to me. Reminiscent of how @bbclaurak coordinated with Matthew Elliot, CEO of Vote Leave to accuse me of conspiracies & lying (without comment). @afneil literally called it conspiracy
— Shahmir Sanni (@shahmiruk) November 1, 2019
Get Boris Johnson out
It would appear that this referral to CPS is just the latest in a long line of possible infractions by PM Boris Johnson. Only the day before on 31 October, Johnson’s refusal to reveal Russian interference in the 2016 referendum was in the news:
Boris Johnson was the face of Vote Leave, which broke electoral law.
There are no excuses for sitting on this report on the threat of Russian electoral interference.
It must be published before Parliament dissolves for the election to be free and fair.https://t.co/JzwcsrhO4T
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) October 31, 2019
So to recap:
CPS passed file on possible criminal charges against Vote Leave, (Johnson, Cummings. Gove et al.)
Jennifer Acuri has confirmed Johnson KNEW about the conflict of interest
Johnson suppressing report on Russian interference in 2016 Ref and 2017 Election.
OK THEN.
— Emma Kennedy (@EmmaKennedy) November 1, 2019
Johnson seems to have built a reputation for lying and misleading the public, which hasn’t gone unnoticed:
The extraordinary Election Lies of Boris Johnson š±
⢠He lied to become Mayor
⢠He lied to become an MP
⢠He lied about EU for Vote Leave
⢠He lied to become Tory leader
⢠He is lying Now!! pic.twitter.com/tvANSq6AiM— ARTIST TAXI DRIVER (@chunkymark) November 2, 2019
Johnson increasingly appears to have the backing of the BBC and other mainstream media outlets. But let’s just hope the public sees past Johnson’s lies and rejects the possibility of electing him on 12 December.
Featured image via YouTube – The Sun/ Wikimedia – EU2017EE Estonian Presidency
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workersā Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us weāre all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesnāt have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardianās. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readersā support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
You’d think the Canary was wholly for Remain wouldn’t you? Except, of course, 3/4 of Labour constituencies voted ‘OUT’ of the EU in the 2016 EU Referendum. So – what’s the Canary doing now 3+ years on seeming to gainsay the democracy of our 2016 EU Referendum? Weird or what?