Corbyn’s coronavirus response just shamed the Tories

Jeremy Corbyn Boris Johnson Coronavirus
Support us and go ad-free

On Saturday 14 March, Jeremy Corbyn wrote to Boris Johnson regarding the coronavirus pandemic. The Labour leader urged the PM to introduce a series of measures to help stave-off the worst effects of the situation. But Corbyn’s measured and sensible response stands in stark contrast to the government’s.

Coronavirus: Corbyn speaks

As of 4pm on Sunday 15 March, there had been another 14 deaths related to coronavirus in the UK, taking the total to 35:

Corbyn wrote to Johnson outlining Labour’s current position:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Perhaps the most important was the Labour leader’s proposed measures.

Act fast. Act now.

Corbyn called for various measures. These included:

  • Every worker having sick pay from day one. This includes self-employed people. The government should consider funding this for all.
  • Raising sick pay in line with the rest of Europe. Currently, the UK has the second-worst rate of sick pay in the EU.
  • Letting people take breaks from paying their mortgage or rent, with no threats of eviction.
  • Forcing the DWP to stop making people attend Universal Credit appointments; stop sanctions and claimant commitments and immediately reduce the five-week wait for a first Universal Credit payment.
  • Supporting food banks.

These measures should, in theory, be crucial. Not least because around 14 million people in the UK already live in poverty. So, aside from the immediate health risks, the government should be shielding the financially precarious from being plunged into even further destitution. That’s a catastrophe that could last well after the effects of coronavirus have left the UK.

Sweeping new powers

The Labour leader also urged the PM to consult his party on new legislation. He said in the letter:

I am now writing to request a meeting with you to discuss the crisis and for urgent sight of the draft legislation, so that the Opposition, in the public interest can feed in proposals or amendments in advance of the parliamentary process

There have been media reports that the Tories are planning to bring in sweeping new powers to tackle coronavirus. These include:

  • Letting police detain people who may be infected.
  • Closing ports.
  • Forcing schools to stay open or close them.
  • Letting councils reduce the levels of support in care homes.

But the move has already sparked controversy.

Feeding the lobby?

Corbyn’s letter continued:

this crisis demands political as well as scientific judgements and clearer public communication based on greater transparency

Again, the government has been criticised for not giving regular updates and allowing the corporate press to relay its messages for it. As writer Charlie Brooker tweeted:

Author and campaigner Liam Young also noted:


Corbyn then moved on to the people most at risk in society. He said:

Any legislation introduced should be rigorously tested by an equality impact assessment and include a financial care package for those groups who are forced into self-isolation and during a period of illness and self-isolation.

On 15 March, people from around the world were sharing their stories about the impact they could face using #HighRiskCOVID-19:

But so far, the UK government has only said that people aged 70 and over may have to self-isolate. It has not factored in any other high-risk groups.

Moreover, the Tories have previously been unconcerned by impact assessments of their policies. For example, if the government can’t do them for social security – can Corbyn expect them for coronavirus?


The Labour leader’s call-to-action is strong. But will the government listen? The World Health Organisation (WHO) has already slammed the Tories’ response to coronavirus. So far, it appears to have fallen on deaf ears.

Corbyn’s plan seems measured, timely, and moreover supports those in society most at risk; not only from coronavirus but the economic impact of it as well. Labour’s stance should shame the Tories into action. But given their ‘fingers-in-their-ears’ approach to coronavirus so far – that’s a highly unlikely scenario.

Featured image via France 24 – YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us