Boris Johnson sat directly on the US election fence at PMQs

Johnson at PMQs 4 November


Support us and go ad-free

It’s almost as if Boris Johnson was hedging his US election bets during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on Wednesday 4 November. Because the PM did not condemn some really dodgy remarks by the current president of the US.

The only “fraud” is the current president

Over in the US people have been calling out Donald Trump. CNN reported that he was “preparing to declare victory”. Trump said:

We were getting ready for a big celebration. We were winning everything. And all of a sudden it was just called off

He also said:

This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment to our country

Trump claimed he would go to the US Supreme Court to get “all voting to stop”. Of course, this was nonsense. Even BBC News admitted when Trump said this there were still:

millions of legitimate ballots left to count

Related articles

Read on...

And it said:

The president has not presented evidence of any fraud.

Enter PMQs

Back in the UK, Labour leader Keir Starmer brought Trump’s comments up at PMQs. He said:

Whatever the result, will the Prime Minister join me in saying that it’s not for a candidate to decide which votes do and don’t count, or when to stop counting. The next president must be the free and fair choice of the American people.

Oh, Starmer. As if Johnson would agree with that statement. The PM said:

We don’t comment as a UK government on the democratic processes of our friends and allies… and I don’t think in all seriousness he would expect otherwise.

Of course, the UK government is quite happy to “comment” (and wilfully interfere) in the “democratic processes” of other countries, like Venezuela. As long as they’re not an ‘ally’ – to corporate capitalism.

All a bit Trumpian?

Earlier in the day, foreign secretary Dominic Raab also refused to condemn Trump’s comments:

Sadly, this is not Raab being “spineless”. This is him and Johnson keeping their options open. It’s also because, as journalist Nadine Batchelor-Hunt said, Johnson’s government is all a bit “Trumpian”:

And as she summed up:

Indeed. Because there was another telling moment from Johnson during PMQs.

Hedging bets?

The debate between the PM and Starmer centred once again around coronavirus (Covid-19). Former ITV News presenter Alastair Stewart summed it up well:

But what was interesting was who Johnson referenced at one point.

Tony Blair wrote an article for the Daily Mail. The PM claimed it was broadly supportive of the government’s pandemic response. So, Johnson said of Starmer’s criticism of the government’s pandemic response that:

what he should do is actually take a leaf out of the Blair book… And by the way, I can tell him that Tony Blair would not have spent four years in the same shadow cabinet with Jeremy Corbyn, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with him.

Of course, Starmer has created this problem for himself. He pretended to support Corbyn in his shadow cabinet and then tried to appease the people who wanted to destroy him once he became leader – culminating in the decision to suspend Corbyn from the Labour Party.

So, would Johnson support Blair-like Joe Biden if he was elected? Possibly. As Raab said on Sky News:

The UK-US relationship is in great shape, and we’re confident that it will go from strength-to-strength whichever candidate wins the election.

Time will tell if that ends up being true. But it seems clear that Johnson’s government will mould itself to fit either another four years of Trump or a new era under Biden. Either way, it may not end well for the rest of us.

Featured image via the Telegraph – YouTube

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Related articles