A Mail on Sunday columnist was talking about racism in the UK media on BBC Question Time. Predictably, when it came to his own newspaper, he denied ever seeing any. Please pick your jaw up off the floor and continue reading.
Cuckoo on Question Time
Dan Hodges is a controversial figure. He had a left-wing upbringing, being the son of former Labour MP Glenda Jackson. But Hodges writes a weekly column for the Mail on Sunday. The Canary‘s Kerry-Anne Mendoza wrote in 2018 that:
Hodges used to describe himself as the “Blairite cuckoo in the Labour nest”
By the 2017 general election, he was writing for The Mail on Sunday and finally switched his vote to Conservative.
His political predictions are legendary. Who knew one man could be so wrong, so consistently? He confidently predicted the victories of both David Miliband and Hillary Clinton.
On Thursday 11 March, Hodges was back making confident statements of fact. This time, it was about racism in the UK establishment corporate media.
Nothing to see here
The situation has been in the spotlight recently. As The Canary previously reported, prince Harry accused the UK press of “racism”. It was in the context of coverage of his wife Meghan Markle This led to a backlash from the media establishment. The now ex-boss of industry body the Society of Editors claimed the UK media doesn’t have a racism problem. He then quit following a backlash from members of his own organisation.
So, on Question Time Hodges seemed to agree that the UK media has a problem. He said:
Let’s be absolutely clear about this. There is racism in the British media.
But then host Fiona Bruce asked if there was racism at the Mail On Sunday. Suddenly, Hodges took a different tone. He said:
Look, I’ll be honest with you. I can’t say that I’ve experienced or seen any racism at my own newspaper.
According to Dan Hodges (Daily Mail), there's racism in the UK press, just not in the Daily mail.
— Femi😷 (@Femi_Sorry) March 11, 2021
He also denied that the coverage of Markle had been racist.
Oh, Dan. Let’s help you out a bit here.
Just some of the evidence
In 2003, people were accusing the Mail on Sunday of xenophobia. Just last December it was inciting hate against German people. A Mail on Sunday article about Marcus Rashford was described as. It lost a defamation case against a man of Pakistani heritage. And with Markle, the paper has also been accused of racism. For example, compare and contrast the same stories on the duchess of Cambridge and her. They appeared in the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday:
And it’s front pages are often tinged with racism and xenophobia:
— Sky News (@SkyNews) July 16, 2016
Not to mention transphobia and trash about social security claimants:
— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 23, 2012
Oh, and some casual homophobia too:
Of course, the Daily Mail and Mail Online are just as bad. But yet, Hodges was still claiming after Question Time that there’s ‘nothing to see here’.
White cishet mansplaining, Hodges-style
He was basically saying that the Mail on Sunday wasn’t racist. And that while people think the Daily Mail and Mail Online might be, that’s nothing to do with him:
Not hiding behind anything. Just pointing out that you sound off a lot about the media, but don’t actually know what you’re talking about. The distinction between the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday isn’t really that hard. Big clue in the respective titles…
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) March 12, 2021
Femi specifically mentioned the Daily Mail. I don't work for the Daily Mail.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) March 12, 2021
Hodges does, of course, ultimately work for DMG Media; a subsidiary of Associated Newspapers – which owns all three outlets. But hey! If a white, straight, male, middle-class and privileged member of the establishment corporate media says the Mail on Sunday isn’t racist – what do the rest of us know?
Featured image via BBC iPlayer
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?