PMQs carnage as Boris Johnson repeatedly loses it

Boris Johnson repeatedly losing it at PMQs
Support us and go ad-free

Boris Johnson looked like a man under pressure at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs). During the session on Wednesday 28 April, he lost it under pressure from an actually forensic Keir Starmer and a bold Ian Blackford.

Tory corruption

Tory corruption is left, right, and centre at present. As The Canary previously reported, the Electoral Commission is investigating Johnson’s Downing Street refurb. Questions also remain over the PM’s ‘let the bodies pile high’ comments. And accusations over dodgy government contracts linger.

So, Tory corruption took centre stage at PMQs – beginning with Starmer.

Much of the centrist corporate media and commentariat often call the Labour leader “forensic“. Meanwhile, people on the left ridicule this. But 28 April might have been the first time Starmer actually lived up to this description. It’s only taken a year.

Starmer: actually forensic for once

In short, the Labour leader invoked his lawyer background. He picked apart all the corruption allegations and asked very specific questions. Newsnight‘s Lewis Goodall summed up proceedings quite well. He tweeted that:

Goodall then noted that Johnson came:

out fighting – says that if Starmer wants to make those remarks he should do so having substantiated them and reveal who is saying so.

And as Goodall tweeted:

Starmer then moved onto the Downing Street refurb. He repeatedly asked Johnson who ‘initially’ paid for it. The PM repeatedly said he “personally” did. But crucially, as Goodall tweeted:

Losing it, PMQs – style

Then, Johnson went on a somewhat extraordinary near two-minute rant:

As Goodall noted:

And then, enter the SNP’s Westminster leader Blackford to give the PM even more of a headache.

Liar, liar

Regarding the ‘bodies pile high’ comment, he said [ED: all the below from 21:20 onwards]:

Parliamentary rules stop me from saying that the Prime Minister has repeatedly lied to the public over the last week. But can I ask the question: are you a liar, Prime Minister?

Johnson said:

Mr Speaker, I leave it to you to judge whether the right honourable gentleman’s remarks were in order

Hoyle then responded:

they’re in order, but were not savoury, and not what we would expect.

The PM said:

I’m grateful to you, Mr Speaker.

Parliamentary nonsense

Blackford’s comment sums up the ridiculous state of affairs in parliament. Because of so-called ‘parliamentary privilege‘, MPs can accuse people of things without the threat of being prosecuted under defamation laws. They can also break court injunctions. As the website allaboutlaw noted, MPs and Lords have sometimes named people at the centre of potential criminal investigations when the media couldn’t.

So, for example a Lord can accuse disgraced businessman Philip Green of “serious and repeated” sexual harassment. But because of other, antiquated parliamentary rules Blackford can’t call the PM a liar.

For once, Starmer and Blackford both had the PM rattled. But how much of it was actual anger from Johnson, and how much was a stage-managed performance? As Green Party MP Caroline Lucas tweeted:

Whether or not Johnson lost it for real, the truth about the allegations against him and any punishment are still a long way off being known.

Featured image via the BBC – YouTube 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us