You know things are bad in the UK media when a journalist from a Rupert Murdoch-created news outlet puts the BBC to shame. But that’s exactly what happened on Sunday 2 May.
The story of Boris Johnson’s flat has been rumbling on. As The Canary previously reported, the Electoral Commission is investigating Johnson’s Downing Street refurb. During Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), the PM repeatedly claimed that he ultimately paid for the flat refurb. But Johnson wouldn’t say who stumped up the cash in the first place. The Canary also reported that Johnson said of the probe:
We will comply with whatever they want, and I don’t think there is anything to see here, or worry about.
Yes. The PM literally said there’s ‘nothing to see here’. Move along, now. But the press pack can smell blood. So, on 2 May, the issue of Johnson’s dodgy refurb was heavily in the media. But the coverage wasn’t all the same. Because Sky host Sophy Ridge did what the BBC failed to do.
Ridge roasting Raab
Sophy Ridge on Sunday set the bar high. Well, high for the corporate press, anyway. She was probing foreign secretary Dominic Raab about ‘flat gate’. Ridge couldn’t help but laugh at one point. Raab was deflecting her question about who signs off on any investigation into whether Johnson broke the ministerial code over his flat. The answer is, of course, Johnson himself.
But Raab didn’t want to admit that. Hence Ridge’s amusement:
Sophy ridge is on fire today 🔥
She starts laughing at Dominic Raab dodging questions when he explains how the voters are in charge of the prime minister
— kerry ✊ (@hewitson10) May 2, 2021
Ridge cut through Raab’s BS perfectly. After he once again tried to dodge her questions, he said:
I think the prime minister’s been very clear
Ridge probably spoke on behalf of much of the UK when she said:
Oh right. The prime minister’s been very clear. I must have missed this. Because I believe the key question is who initially paid for the refurbishment of the flat. Has he been clear in answering that?
And of course Johnson hasn’t:
#Ridge – The Sunday Times has been told there was a 2nd invoice for the work carried out at No.10… is that true?
— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) May 2, 2021
So, did Raab get such a pasting on the Andrew Marr Show? Not likely.
Marr misses the mark
The host spent around one minute asking Raab about the issue. Marr posed two questions:
- Does Raab think Johnson should resign if the Electoral Commission says Johnson’s broken the law?
- Does Raab have “complete faith in the Electoral Commission”?
Raab failed to give coherent answers to either. And that was that. He probably breathed a sigh of relief, because Marr basically let him off the hook. Much like his colleague Laura Kuenssberg did with an article about Johnson and the “truth”. It didn’t go down well on social media:
Laura Kuenssberg’s article on Johnson’s ‘relationship with the truth’ is wild. No concrete examples, and odd attempts to excuse his behaviour.
I spoke to @PeterStefanovi2 & @carolinelucas recently who are actually interested in holding the PM to account. https://t.co/RgPl7cZrtw
— Harry Cockburn (@HarryCockburn) May 2, 2021
Another Twitter user criticised Kuenssberg for not giving “any examples” of Johnson’s repeated and provable lying:
According to Laura K, he has "a complicated relationship with truth" and is a bit like Steve Jobs, but she can't find any examples of him actually *lying*
How can you call yourself a journalist if you can't find an example of Johnson lying?
— Russ Jones (@RussInCheshire) May 2, 2021
Campaigning lawyer Peter Stefanovic had something to say about that:
— Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) May 2, 2021
But of course, there’s a broader point to be made about the media pile-on over Johnson’s wallpaper.
Keeping the palette clean
Who paid for his refurb costs is really the least of the PM’s crimes. As Sarah tweeted:
Something is seriously wrong when wallpaper might get you sacked but mass killing is acceptable.
— Sarah ..❤️ (@Just_Sara_h) April 29, 2021
Indeed. It seems that the corporate media would prefer to go after dodgy wallpaper than Johnson allegedly saying:
no more fucking lockdowns – let the bodies pile high in their thousands
Because dodgy financial agreements over paint and soft furnishings are far more palatable than a PM who’d happily see his own citizens dead. And no amount of forthright journalism from Ridge, or limp questions from Marr, should detract from this.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?