Priti Patel’s controversial new immigration bill has thrown up a troubling possibility: that the Royal National Lifeboat Institution’s (RNLI) volunteers could spend life in prison for helping drowning refugees and asylum seekers.
The Nationality and Borders Bill
As The Canary previously reported:
The Nationality and Borders Bill [entered] parliament on 6 July. The Home Office said its reforms will make it harder for people who enter the UK ‘illegally’ to stay.
Patel said the new bill will change our “broken asylum system”, stopping gangs from facilitating illegal journeys to the UK. She added it will further streamline the removal of “those with no right to be here”.
You can read Jasmine Norden’s analysis of the bill here. As she wrote:
The proposals in this bill serve to harm refugees desperately in need of safety. They will make it harder for them to gain asylum and criminalise them for trying to escape danger.
And there’s one bit of the bill which is causing a fresh outcry.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
Criminalising a charity
Richard Murphy tweeted that:
Unbelievably, the government’s immigration and asylum bill criminalises the RNLI saving asylum seekers at peril in the English Channel. As a life governor of the RNLI I am deeply shocked https://t.co/VgT4hQcXIr via @freemovementlaw
— Richard Murphy (@RichardJMurphy) July 6, 2021
This seems to be a distinct possibility. As Colin Yeo wrote for freemovement, Patel is changing the law on helping asylum seekers getting into the UK. Previously, if a person “facilitates” this, it would only be illegal if it was for that person’s “gain”. But Patel wants to remove the word “gain”. So, as Yeo summed up:
While someone working for an organisation that “aims to assist asylum-seekers” cannot be charged with this offence, someone who works for a more general-purpose charity like the RNLI and who helps an asylum seeker enter the UK may, on the face of it, be criminalised by this change.
The bill is currently at an early stage in its passage through parliament. This means it’s not yet clear what the implications are for charities like RNLI. George Peretz QC explained:
One aspect of this clause is that the RNLI would appear to be guilty of an offence if they rescue a boatload of people obviously seeking illegal entry and bring them safely to shore. https://t.co/lI7CY5qM3M
— George Peretz QC (@GeorgePeretzQC) July 7, 2021
Peretz offered some thoughts on why Patel’s department might target charities like RNLI:
This is, I’d guess, a mess-up – of the type familiar to anyone who’s ever been involved in a complex Bill – rather than deliberate. But what Ministers decide not to focus on tells you as much about them as what they do decide to focus on.
— George Peretz QC (@GeorgePeretzQC) July 7, 2021
More readings of the bill are still to come. However, the suggestion that the state could prosecute a charity whose sole purpose is saving lives on the water – for doing just that – is very troubling. The maximum sentence for this is life imprisonment.
As Murphy wrote:
I have been a long time supporter of the RNLI… I am deeply shocked by this move… to find that saving the life of an asylum seeker is now to be criminalised is profoundly shocking. What sort of mentality is required to create such a possibility?
But as Daniel Sohege said on Twitter, who else could the Tories prosecute for rescuing drowning asylum seekers?
Removing "for gain" implies a serious proposition by the Home Secretary to prosecute not only the RNLI, as others have already said, but also anybody rescuing drowning asylum seekers at sea, in clear contravention of international law and basic humanity.https://t.co/bGGjPwanao. https://t.co/nwr5x6lw0U
— Daniel Sohege 🧡 (@stand_for_all) July 7, 2021
Writer Alex Tiffin thought maybe boat skippers:
Will removing the "for gain" clause for helping Asylum Seekers enter the UK, put the RNLI, NGOs or boat skippers at risk of prosecution unless clauses are added?@BarristerSecret pic.twitter.com/r9QMQSXgRS
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) July 7, 2021
The RNLI had already faced abuse from the far-right. Nigel Farage recently called it a “taxi service for illegal immigration”. The Daily Mail then ran a story on his claim. But the charity is not having it. It said in a statement on Twitter:
Our lifeboats operate under international maritime law, which states we are permitted and indeed obligated to enter the waters of other territories for search and rescue purposes.
Where we believe there is a risk to life at sea, we will always launch.
So, first Farage and now our far-right government are demonising refugees and asylum seekers so much they’re apparently willing to criminalise one of the most well-known charities in the country. When he was London mayor, Boris Johnson supported the RNLI. How the political wind changes.Support us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.