A new Met Police scheme to ‘keep women safe’ misses the point entirely

The Met Police still don’t get it. Or at least that’s what people are saying about their latest scheme to rebuild women’s trust since Sarah Everard’s murder. The force’s new rules mean that plain-clothes cops must prove their identity as police to lone women.
But there is a problem. Sarah Everard was murdered by a real cop who was in active service. So it’s not altogether clear exactly how this new initiative would make a real difference.
Killer cop
In September 2021, firearms officer Wayne Couzens was given life in jail for murdering the 33-year-old Everard in March 2020. He used his authority as a cop to arrest, handcuff and kidnap her.
Now the Met says plain clothes officers dealing with lone women will videocall headquarters, where someone will confirm the officer’s ID:
Any lone, plain clothed police officer who engages with a woman on her own will now verify their identity through a new process.
We know we need to regain women’s trust.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeWe fully accept the onus is on us to verify we are who we say we are & that we are acting appropriately.
— Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) October 20, 2021
But as many people on Twitter were quick to point out, even if Couzens had done this he would have been confirmed as a real cop. Because that is precisely what he was:
So if Wayne Cousins called this number, the control room person would have confirmed that he is a police officer, correct?
— Elaine (@Sundancer) October 20, 2021
Another Twitter user agreed that the new process did nothing to address the issue. And that the video itself was pretty creepy:
Not only is this a shit idea that doesn't fix the problem of possibly being raped and murdered by verifiable police officers, but this little animation they came up with is crap and creepy as well.
Good job all round! https://t.co/B4EQY6I8BQ
— Mer🎃 (@mer_edie) October 21, 2021
While another Twitter user was concerned whether the new ID process will tell you about the officer’s own background. Such as if he is has a history of sexual misconduct:
Cool. Will this process also flag if he’s one of the 52% of Met police officers found guilty of sexual misconduct who kept their job? https://t.co/CEXsVGOmLf
— Terri White (@Terri_White) October 21, 2021
And another person pointed out how quickly the Met had created a narrative that Wayne Couzens was somehow an outsider, rather than what he was: an actively serving cop. And we should add, a serving cop with a long and identifiable history of sexual misconduct:
Genuinely nightmarish how quickly and successfully the police and media rewrote the narrative around Wayne Couzens into one where he was simply pretending to be a police officer https://t.co/LyTl1p4yEj
— ACAB Rees-Mogg (@jelly_pack) October 20, 2021
It seems like the Met Police will have to do a lot more than dream up these kind of madcap schemes if they want to win back the trust of women – or anyone else for that matter.
Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Philius.
Get involved
- See the Network for Police Monitoring or the Sisters’ Uncut community Copwatch patrols
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.