Corporate media whitewashed Amnesty’s Israel ‘apartheid’ report

Amnesty International has said Israel’s actions and policies against Palestinians amount to apartheid. The global human rights group’s verdict has been met with anger from the Israeli government. But moreover, it’s been met with a whitewash from the corporate media.
‘Clearly apartheid’
You can read Amnesty’s full report here. Its secretary general Agnès Callamard said in a statement:
Our report reveals the true extent of Israel’s apartheid regime. Whether they live in Gaza, East Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank, or Israel itself, Palestinians are treated as an inferior racial group and systematically deprived of their rights. We found that Israel’s cruel policies of segregation, dispossession and exclusion across all territories under its control clearly amount to apartheid. The international community has an obligation to act
The coverage in the corporate media has been dire across the board.
The BBC and the Guardian
Media Lens looked at how two outlets covered the report. First up, it said the Guardian did “its best to downplay” the report:
As expected, @guardian does its best to downplay the new @amnesty report declaring #Israel an #apartheid state.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free* Barely introduces report, then promotes #Israeli view
* Accusation of 'antisemitism' upfront
* Briefest article possible that hardly scratches the surface pic.twitter.com/UJf1RY9eb8
— Media Lens (@medialens) February 1, 2022
Media Lens also called out the BBC. It failed to mention Amnesty’s report on the 10pm news:
Remarkable, but predictable.
No space on last night’s @BBCNews at Ten to even *mention* @amnesty’s report declaring #Israel an #apartheid state.
But there *was* time to squeeze in a major item on #Wordle.
BBC News. #Propaganda by omission. pic.twitter.com/ea1hlgPOIF— Media Lens (@medialens) February 2, 2022
The BBC News article on the report also included the Israeli government accusing Amnesty of antisemitism.
Dire coverage
Other parts of the corporate media’s reporting was equally dire. The Financial Times headline said:
The Times also took Israel’s response as the lead. Sky News‘s framing of the report was somewhat better. It also included Israel’s response to Amnesty, but it ended its article noting that the International Criminal Court was investigating possible Israeli war crimes.
What also stood out was a general lack of coverage in the rest of the corporate media. UK outlets like the Mirror and the Daily Mail failed to report on it.
Israel’s apartheid: destroying lives
Callamard summed up by saying:
The international response to apartheid must no longer be limited to bland condemnations and equivocating. Unless we tackle the root causes, Palestinians and Israelis will remain locked in the cycle of violence which has destroyed so many lives.
Israel’s immediate backlash shows that it wants to do everything it can to stop this happening. The media’s response was dire. So, it’s up to activists and campaigners to amplify Amnesty’s message: that the Israeli government is indeed operating apartheid policies.
Featured image via BBC iPlayer – screengrab and Amnesty International Nepal – Wikimedia, reduced to 70×29 under licence CC SA 4.0
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Israel was set as an apartheid state from the planning stage on.
And no point even trying to criticise the Mirror for it’s lack of coverage on it’s website, as they delete any post and put up auto moderation checks on any user who dares to speak out.
Your comment highlights the lack of any truly national left-focused news site which permits public debate on topics that matter. Even this site has a really poor comments system without notifications.