Revealed: the insider evidence that shines a light on one of the biggest police scandals in British history

Support us and go ad-free

Gordon Mills, a former Chief Inspector with the now defunct National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (NETCU), is suing the GMB trade union. He claims [pdf] that the GMB made libellous comments regarding a meeting he attended in 2008 with The Consulting Association (TCA).

TCA, run by Ian Kerr (who died in December 2012), specialised in blacklisting – whereby people were denied work because of their politics or union activism. 3,213 people were placed on the TCA list, which was used by at least 44 construction companies including Balfour Beatty, Laing O’Rourke and Sir Robert McAlpine. Once on the blacklist, workers were either unable to find employment or were quickly dismissed once employed.

Many have long suspected that the police, particularly undercover police officers, shared information with blacklisting organisations. Now, ‘insider’ evidence has come to light that only raises more questions about the level and purpose of police liaison with vetting agencies.

The defamation claim by Mills

In his court submission [pdf], Mills begins (section 3) by describing NETCU as “devoted to the reduction and removal of the threat to companies, organisations, and individuals and to public order from criminal acts of violence, harassment, and intimidation by domestic extremism groups and individuals”.

He then quotes (page 5) from a GMB article (page 5 of the submission), which states that the meeting at Woodstock was attended by representatives of several major construction companies, including Vinci, Amex, SIAS Building Services, Skanska, Sir Robert McAlpine and Emcor. On page 6 of the submission, Mills quotes the GMB as saying that NETCU had “established links” to TCA – something Mills denies. (NB: Here’s Ian Kerr’s handwritten note listing TCA main contacts.)

Mills adds that the GMB article referred to an interview with Ian Kerr released in a January 2013 article [paywall] in The Times (which Mills is not suing for defamation). In that interview, Kerr talked of “dealings” with NETCU and a “key officer”, and also about how TCA had established links with the “police and security services”. Significantly, Kerr added:

They were seeking a channel to inform construction companies [of the information] they were collecting [and] they were waiting to be able to feed it out to the companies.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

He also said a “two-way information exchange” had been opened.

Mills denies the claims made by the GMB and argues:

Both the nature and purpose of the meeting [at Woodstock] and my role in it have been misunderstood.

Evidence of an ‘insider’

The High Court will rule on the specifics of this case in due course, though it’s not yet clear if it will examine the wider picture, too. In this regard, the GMB refers in its defence submission [pdf] (page 4) to what it calls the “Public Interest” – in particular, the role of political policing in Britain generally (page 5 onwards).

But there are other aspects that are not referred to by either party.

Here is an extract of sworn testimony to the High Court, from January 2016, by Ian Kerr’s wife Mary:

screenshot-from-2016-10-14-15-43-05

(NB: Carillion is a construction company and was a TCA client.)

The ‘smoking gun’?

There were notes made about the Woodstock meeting by Kerr, a copy of which was leaked to John McDonnell MP. According to an article in The Guardian, these notes (which The Guardian had seen) confirmed names of attendees. The article also states the notes suggested Mills attended the meeting to explain about police efforts to fight domestic extremism and that he was available to “to liaise with industry”.

The notes, under the sub-heading ‘Gathering Information’, also recorded Mills as saying “‘Cos [companies] need to have strong vetting procedures in place”.

Here, published for the first time, is a leaked copy of these notes [pdf]. Below is an extract [highlights added]:

screenshot-from-2016-10-14-15-01-25

Revolving door?

There are many examples of how, on retirement, Britain’s political police go on to advise the security or employment vetting industries. Here are just two:

  • Mills’ NECTU boss was Superintendent Steve Pearl, who (after leaving the police) went on to be a director of vetting specialists Agenda Security Services, which boasts that its staff includes “teams of ex-police, ex-military, desktop researchers and security analysts”.
  • Steve Pearl’s boss, Assistant Chief Constable Anton Setchell, ended up as the security head for construction company Laing O’Rourke, which was a client of TCA.

The notes made of the Woodstock meeting raise more questions about the role of Britain’s police and their links to industry. And this is more relevant than ever, given the Pitchford Inquiry into undercover policing and the disquiet raised as a consequence.

Get Involved!

– Find out about the Pitchford Inquiry into undercover policing.

– Support Spies Out of Our Lives.

Featured image via Dave Crosby/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed