If this doesn’t get the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg fired, nothing will [TWEETS]

kuenssberg BBC GE2017
Support us and go ad-free

By 8.20am at the start of the week, the BBC‘s Laura Kuenssberg had already spouted Tory propaganda. With a public broadcaster like this, the incumbent government doesn’t need its own spin machine. And her shocker of a statement has already led to calls for her resignation, suspension or downright firing.

Theresa May couldn’t give a shit about people

As The Guardian pointed out, the Prime Minister has decided she won’t bother campaigning on 24 April. Even though we’re only one week into the general election campaign. And the window of time for her to get out the vote is a mere 44 days. In contrast, Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn is up in Scotland trying to win back voters; and Lib Dem Tim Farron is campaigning in Vauxhall.

But how did Kuenssberg explain May’s arrogant and disrespectful treatment of the voters? She, of course, blamed Corbyn:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

So according to the BBC‘s Political Editor, May is ignoring the general public as part of her party’s “strategy”. And Kuenssberg suggests that May’s game plan is in response to Labour’s actions. Or, more specifically, the actions of its leader.

Corbyn’s ‘juice’

What Kuenssberg refers to as Labour’s “juice” is Corbyn’s comments on The Andrew Marr Show. On the programme, the Labour leader hesitated to champion drone strikes; because, he asserted, they are notoriously inaccurate and kill innocent civilians. And he’s right. In one five-month period of a US operation in Afghanistan, for example, almost nine out of ten people killed in the air strikes were not the actual target.

Furthermore, Corbyn suggested the UK should adhere to its commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) when considering the renewal of Trident. And he said that the use of nuclear weapons would be “a disaster for the whole world”.

That’s the “juice” Kuenssberg is referencing in her defence of May’s contempt.

Grow some ethics, Kuenssberg

Kuenssberg’s assessment, however, didn’t go down well with those that witnessed it:


And some tried to correct Kuenssberg, by listing the real reason May might be ducking out of the campaign trail:

In just a few unwitting characters, Kuenssberg revealed how wedded she is to the Conservative Party; and, like May, how small an obligation she feels to the public in her position at the BBC. But this appears to reflect the position of the BBC as a whole.

This spin, however, went down like a lead balloon with people who saw it. Because licence payers expect at least a degree of impartiality from the public broadcaster. And it’s about time the BBC lived up to that.

Get Involved!

Register to vote in the 8 June general election. If you don’t have a national insurance number, a 5 minute phone call on 0300 200 3500 will get it sent to you in ten days.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on BBC bias and the 2017 general election.

Featured image via Policy Exchange/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed