Theresa May could be trying [pdf] to sneak a tax bombshell into the Conservative manifesto. Unlike Labour, which is pledging that any tax increases will only affect the richest 5%, May is determined to keep punishing the poorest.
Tax breaks for the rich
The manifesto [pdf] claims that:
The Conservatives will always be the party that keeps tax as low as possible and spends the proceeds responsibly.
But what that means is that it wants to keep taxes as low as possible for the rich. The party plans to raise the higher rate income tax threshold from £45,000 to £50,000, meaning those earning more will pay less tax.
And it still plans to drop corporation tax to 17% by 2020. According to the manifesto, this will give the UK the lowest corporation tax of any developed country. And, in doing so, make the UK a haven for wealthy businesses, while the rest of us suffer.
But what’s missing
But as always the devil is in the detail. And while the manifesto [pdf] promises no rise in VAT, it has dropped its 2015 pledge not to raise National Insurance – a tax hike which could see millions of people out of pocket.
The choice on 8 June is increasingly clear. Vote Labour and a party that promises tax increases only for the top 5%. Or vote Conservative and vote for wealthy elites and big business taking even more money from our pockets.
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
-Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?