On Thursday 29 June, George Osborne announced he had a new job. But besides the obvious struggle to keep up with how many jobs the former chancellor actually has, people were left scratching their heads. Because Osborne appears totally unqualified for his new role.
Osborne reportedly [paywall] announced in an email to staff at The Evening Standard (where he is editor; job number one) that he has been made an Honorary Professor of Economics at the University of Manchester. A city for which he is responsible, in part, for economic growth (he is chair of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership; job number two).
While this new role ties in with other work Osborne does (he is an adviser to the vulture capitalists at Blackrock; job number three), his prowess in economics is, at best, questionable. Because his track record as chancellor was nothing short of chaotic.
Osborne presided over:
- National debt increasing by more than 50%.
- The country not seeing a real terms pay rise. At all.
- Implementing quantitative easing which only benefited the wealthiest.
- The rise of the insecure, precarious ‘gig’ economy.
- Watching the UK current account deficit hit a peacetime record of 7%.
- Criticism of his austerity programme, even from international bodies such as the IMF.
But luckily for the former chancellor, his new role will include lots of talking (something he does repeatedly at six-figure speaking engagements; job number four). And being a Professor of Economics will probably involve debate (something which job number five at the McCain thinktank will help with).
But it is unclear just how qualified the former Etonian with a 2:1 degree in Modern History really is for this, job number six. Because if his maths is anything to go by, then he may struggle to lecture to a primary school class. Let alone a room of university students:
– Join The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?