On 18 July, The Daily Mail ran this front page:
The story is based on a new report on voter registration by the UK’s elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission. That report [pdf] says “it is troubling that some voters appear to have admitted voting more than once at the general election”. But there’s a problem with the story as presented by the right-wing media. In fact, as The Mirror has pointed out, there are several.
1) The scale of the problem
For starters, The Mail suggests:
Thousands of students may have voted twice to try to put Jeremy Corbyn into Downing Street.
This would indeed be serious, and could have swung many seats. But the Electoral Commission doesn’t actually mention how many cases there were. In fact, it explicitly says [pdf] it has so far seen no evidence of widespread abuse:
We take these reports very seriously, though there is so far a lack of evidence of widespread abuse.
The Mail‘s “thousands” apparently refers to the number of emails the Electoral Commission received, rather than the number of incidences of alleged fraud. Which brings us to the next problem.
2) The source of the story
The Mail reports that the Electoral Commission:
received more than 1,000 emails from the public as well as 38 complaints from MPs.
But it fails to mention what concerns those emails raised. The Electoral Commission is clear [pdf] about this. The complaints did not refer to cases of fraud witnessed by members of the public. In fact, the complaints referred to – wait for it – stories in the media [emphasis added]:
In the days following the election, a number of people on social media claimed that they had voted twice at the general election. We received a significant amount of correspondence referring to these posts – at the time of writing, we had received 38 letters from MPs raising constituents’ concerns, as well as 1,013 emails and 15 telephone calls from members of the public referring to media reports about these claims.
In other words, the right-wing media are asserting that voter fraud is widespread because members of the public complained to the Electoral Commission after reading reports about it in the right-wing media.
3) The perpetrators
The Mail pins the blame for any fraud firmly on students. But the Electoral Commission doesn’t single out students. In fact, it mentions [pdf] a few groups who may be entitled to register to vote in more than one place, including second homeowners.
The Mail, of course, is trying to suggest that this is a story about students voting for Jeremy Corbyn. That headline again:
Probe is launched into ‘students who voted TWICE for Jeremy Corbyn’
But as The Mirror points out:
The report does not explicitly mention the Labour party or the Labour leader.
4) The voter surge
The commission highlighted unusual surges in voter registration in a number of university towns and cities
But this surge followed concerted campaigning by youth groups, campaigners, and the Labour Party itself in order to get young people to register to vote. That’s democracy. As Labour’s Cat Smith, the Shadow Minister for Voter Engagement and Youth Affairs, told The Independent:
To build a healthy democracy we need active participation of all citizens, which is why the Labour Party delivered a ground-breaking digital campaign which sought to maximise the number of young people to register to vote during the election period.
And in fact, many students were actually turned away from voting – because of electoral registration problems.
The evidence isn’t there
Double voting is, rightly, a criminal offence in the UK. And the electoral system in the UK clearly needs reform. At the moment, Britain’s 381 electoral registers are, as the Electoral Commission puts it, “dispersed and unconnected”. So it’s difficult to identify duplicates. And, of course, it may yet turn out that a number of students did ‘double vote’ for Corbyn.
But right now, the evidence isn’t there. Yet The Mail decided the story was robust enough to splash across its front page, pinning the blame on students.
If we want a real democracy in this country, we need a robust electoral system. But we also urgently need a media that does its job – and sooner rather than later.
– Want to contribute to the increasing democratisation of Britain’s media environment? Read and support independent news outlets that hold the powerful to account:
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Another Angry Voice, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?