On Monday 30 October, Andrea Leadsom spoke to the House of Commons about allegations of sexual abuse at Westminster. Theresa May, who has been accused [paywall] of knowing about abuse before the leak, appeared beside her. People watching described May as looking “angry” and “finished“:
— Robert Peston (@Peston) October 30, 2017
A new statement from a government spokesperson has done little to convince people that May did not already know about the accusations.
Speaking to Business Insider, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister refused to say when May knew about the allegations:
I don’t have a timetable for that…
What I can point to very quickly is that once the allegations were made public the Prime Minister asked for that review to take place and as you also saw she sent a letter as leader of the Conservative party to the Speaker looking more broadly at the issues and the next steps that will be taken.
Why is Theresa May refusing to say when she first heard about sexual harassment by Tory MPs? https://t.co/R36l3uwoWc
— Owen Jones🌹 (@OwenJones84) October 31, 2017
The spokesperson also denied the existence of a dossier of allegations:
I can’t get into every conversation that the Prime Minister has ever had.
But the fact is you are referring to speculation over the weekend about a dossier. There is no dossier and therefore the Prime Minister hasn’t seen one.
Government whips have spoken openly about keeping such information on MPs in the past. But this obviously does not confirm that the practice continues.
The most important outcome in this situation is that the abuse stops. For that to happen, there must be confidence that change can happen.
Until May is clear about what she knew and when, that confidence will be hard to achieve.
– Support Sisters Uncut, taking direct action for domestic violence services.
– Donate to South Yorkshire Women’s Aid’s crowdfunder to keep the service open.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?