South Wales Police have been accused of breaching civil liberties by using facial recognition technology (FRT) at an arms trade protest in Cardiff. The force used the controversial technology during protests at the Defence Procurement Research Technology Exhibition (DPRTE) on 27 March.
According to The Register, the technology scans a database of 500,000 custody images to make matches. During a review in December 2017, South Wales Police claimed to have made 191 positive matches and 12 arrests.
Speaking about its use at football matches, Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo stated:
It is a great infringement of fans’ rights…Thousands of innocent people will have their faces scanned against a database of half a million photos.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
The Metropolitan Police also came under fire for using the technology during the Notting Hill Carnival. The director of Liberty, Martha Spurrier, claimed:
This intrusive biometric surveillance has no place at the Notting Hill carnival. There is no basis in law for facial recognition, no transparency around its use.
Use on protests
But it is believed that this is the first time the technology has been openly deployed at a protest. Speaking to The Canary, Val Aston – a researcher on the human rights implications of overt police surveillance at the Law School, University of East Anglia – said:
This is the first time that I have been aware of the police openly using FRT to monitor protest activity, and it is a clear step-change in the policing of political assemblies.
Aston believes that the use of FRT is a threat to human rights:
The capabilities of FRT – identifying, tracking and recording associations – enable a systematic surveillance process which, if it is used to monitor political activists, creates a huge threat to the right to freedom of assembly.
And she thinks the threat to civil liberties must not be “underestimated”:
Up until now, South Wales Police have used FRT to target ticket touts, and people with outstanding court warrants. Using this system to identify people taking part in political protest is a very different thing. These are campaigners, not criminals. And the threat to civil rights should not be underestimated.
The Canary contacted South Wales Police for comment but received none by the time of publication.
Featured image via author
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?