A lawyer nails Philip Hammond’s utter betrayal of five million public sector workers

Fréa Lockley

In the 2018 Autumn Budget, chancellor Philip Hammond is expected to announce that public sector pay rises will be linked to performance and where people live in the UK. The Mirror reports that this ban on “blanket pay rises” will affect 5 million public sector workers, including nurses, teachers, doctors and those working in the emergency services.

Unions and many others have criticised the proposal because it’s such a betrayal. And as lawyer and campaigner Peter Stefanovic pointed out, there’s also a major flaw.

Performance?

In July, the government announced an end to the 1% public sector pay cap which limited pay rises for six years.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

On 21 October, a report in the Telegraph indicated that there will be no “blanket” pay rises for public sector workers. Liz Truss, chief secretary to the treasury, reportedly linked public sector jobs with those in the private sector. She said, “those in the regions…should receive lower pay rises”. She also:

suggested that pay should be tied to performance and that any rises should be accompanied by reforms that aim to make the public sector more efficient.

Many people are furious about this news.

Teachers, nurses and all those in the emergency services work tirelessly every day for very little financial reward. As Stefanovic pointed out, if pay were truly performance related, they should all “be millionaires”, regardless of where they live:

Divide

Many, including Labour MP Angela Rayner, also pointed out that this proposal will create “a North/South divide on pay”:

And as the GMB union stated, the consequences of this would be devastating:

regional pay will introduce a postcode lottery which will widen inequality and see public sector workers forced to leave poorer areas just to keep the same salary.

Where’s the logic?

And Truss’s ‘logic’ behind the proposals is also flawed. Because as GMB pointed out, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS):

Public sector pay rates are already 5.5% lower than those in comparable roles in the private sector, according to the ONS. The Treasury also estimates that public sector pay rates are lower than those in the private sector.

News that the 1% cap would end coincided with a Resolution Foundation report which established that despite a rise in employment “millions of families” were “worse off” than in 2003. As Dave Prentis, general secretary of UNISON explained, most public sector workers are already struggling under this Tory government:

As joint general secretary of the National Education Union Kevin Courtney said, it’s actually “a pay cap”. Unite the Union also called the proposals “unfair and discriminatory”.

Your turn now…

As Stefanovic also says, many MPs – especially Tories – should, by this logic be totally broke. Because the last eight years of Conservative-led governments have brought nothing but utter chaos to the country. Poverty is rising and more people than ever are struggling financially. It’s time for Tory MPs to learn what that’s really like.

Get Involved!

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured images via YouTube and  Raul Mee (EU2017EE)/Flickr

 

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed

Fréa Lockley