• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Zuckerberg quietly hid left-wing news from you, it’s just been revealed

Jasmine Norden by Jasmine Norden
20 October 2020
in Global, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
167 7
A A
3
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Facebook intentionally curbed the visibility of left-leaning news outlets from its algorithm in 2017, limiting their readership, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has reported.

According to WSJ, when Facebook engineers altered the newsfeed algorithm to reduce political news, changes had a larger impact on left-wing sites. The WSJ reported that Mark Zuckerberg personally approved the changes.

The alterations were made after executives raised concerns that right-wing sites would be affected more by plans to reduce political news.

The impact on publishers

One of the outlets thought to have been affected by the changes is progressive outlet Mother Jones. The publication is a magazine that focuses on investigative journalism.

The editor-in-chief of Mother Jones estimated that the reduction in traffic meant losses of “$400,000 to $600,000 a year” for the magazine and resulted in pay cuts.

Ben Dreyfuss, editorial director for growth and strategy at Mother Jones, said:

[Social media editors] want people to read the stories. They want to make a difference. A lot of times, it doesn’t work and that’s just life, but when it doesn’t work ever, it is very frustrating, because you feel like you’ve let down not only your audience but your colleagues. It’s difficult and disheartening to keep running into walls, and to learn that the walls were placed there intentionally, so my colleagues and I would be stopped as we tried to promote our magazine’s work, makes me livid.

Bias claims

After Trump was elected in November 2016, Facebook was accused of playing a large part in the circulation of ‘fake news’.

Conservative outlets claimed Facebook had an anti-conservative bias in 2016 after it was alleged that workers had removed right-wing topics from the ‘trending’ section.

According to The WSJ, fears were raised that updates on political news visibility would add to accusations of anti-conservative bias. This reportedly lead to redesign that affected “left-leaning sites… more than previously planned”

In response to the allegations, A Facebook spokesperson told the WSJ:

We did not make changes with the intent of impacting individual publishers.

Facebook’s algorithm history

In 2018, Zuckerberg announced that Facebook would make changes to its algorithm to give priority to content from “friends, family and groups”. Facebook would also limit the visibility of content from media and businesses.

Some left-wing publications had already reported noticing their Facebook traffic had dropped dramatically.

In response, several left-wing UK outlets, including The Canary, joined together in March 2018 to try and maintain the availability of their publications. A joint Facebook group was created ‘to help combat technical changes imposed by Facebook’. However, with the US election currently approaching The Canary has noticed another reduction in the reach of its articles on Facebook. The secretive nature of Facebook’s and Google’s algorithm means that news sites have no control or understanding of how changes to it will affect their ability to reach readers.

To ensure you always see articles from The Canary you can sign-up for free to our daily news email here.

Featured image via Flickr/Anthony Quintano

Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Devastating survey of rape survivors shows need for systemic change

Next Post

NSPCC under fire for accepting donations from UK company implicated in the demolition of Palestinian homes

Next Post
JCB equipment is used in a West Bank home demolition

NSPCC under fire for accepting donations from UK company implicated in the demolition of Palestinian homes

South Yorkshire to be placed in Tier 3 coronavirus restrictions

Met Police urged to withdraw ‘misleading and unlawful’ advice to pubs

Met Police urged to withdraw ‘misleading and unlawful’ advice to pubs

Business leaders describe a ‘pointless’ call with Boris Johnson and Michael Gove over Brexit

Business leaders describe a ‘pointless’ call with Boris Johnson and Michael Gove over Brexit

SAGE scientist says UK can expect 'tens of thousands' of deaths in the second wave

Comments 3

  1. lanterndude says:
    6 years ago

    Consent is manufactured. Ignorance is not stupidity. Billionaires depend on the successful maintenance of both consent and ignorance of alternatives. T’internet over produces information so that finding some information is similar to trying to find Wally/Waldo. It’s there but sometimes takes time and effort to find. The trouble with t’internet is it exists almost exclusively on the ‘Bourgeois terrain’, which is anti-left and naturally right-wing.

    Reply
    • bkwanab says:
      6 years ago

      Lanterndude is absolutely correct. I suggest this is an example for the breakup of FaceBook as another over powerful monopoly. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

      Reply
  2. Gnu says:
    6 years ago

    It’s funny, just about the only thing TheCanary and TheTramp agree on is corporate mainstream ‘fake news’, lol lol.

    Shame TheTramp didn’t hire Chomsky or Media Lens to sort that out. 😉

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scottish parliament
Analysis

Scottish Parliament backs luxury wealth tax on mansions and private jets

by Cameron Baillie
8 June 2026
Real Madrid Perez
Analysis

Pérez retains Real Madrid presidency after first election in 20 years

by Alaa Shamali
8 June 2026
Reform James Evans
Analysis

Senior Welsh Reform politician ‘infantilises’ entire Welsh nation

by Cameron Baillie
8 June 2026
Bellingham
Global

Tuchel tells Bellingham to fight for his place

by Alaa Shamali
8 June 2026
Senegal
Global

Senegal primed for World Cup after AFCON debacle

by Alaa Shamali
8 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart