Race report ‘attempts to normalise white supremacy’ – UN human rights experts
A controversial report into racial disparities attempts to “normalise white supremacy” and the Government should reject its findings, human rights experts from the UN have warned.
The UN Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent said it “categorically rejects and condemns” the findings of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities (Cred).
The Government-commissioned report said racism is a “real force” but that Britain is no longer a country where the “system is deliberately rigged against ethnic minorities”.
Its chairman said it had found no evidence of “institutional racism”, and the report criticised the way the term has been applied, saying it should not be used as a “catch-all” phrase for any microaggression.
UN experts strongly reject #UKGovernment-backed report into racism, saying it further distorts and falsifies historic facts, and could even fuel racism, racial discrimination and negative racial stereotypes.👉 https://t.co/VlQ4N1hopL#FightRacism pic.twitter.com/gMQ21YpFaO
— UN Special Procedures (@UN_SPExperts) April 19, 2021
Read on...
Support us and go ad-free
In a statement released by the UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, the experts wrote:
In 2021, it is stunning to read a report on race and ethnicity that repackages racist tropes and stereotypes into fact, twisting data and misapplying statistics and studies into conclusory findings and ad hominem attacks on people of African descent.
The group has urged the Government to reject the findings.
They added:
The report cites dubious evidence to make claims that rationalise white supremacy by using the familiar arguments that have always justified racial hierarchy.
This attempt to normalise white supremacy despite considerable research and evidence of institutional racism is an unfortunate sidestepping of the opportunity to acknowledge the atrocities of the past and the contributions of all in order to move forward.
Following its publication on March 31, the Cred report was criticised as being divisive, while it was also accused of “putting a positive spin on slavery and empire”.
The Commission has said any suggestion that it would downplay the atrocities of slavery is “as absurd as it is offensive”.
In the report’s foreword, commission chairman Dr Tony Sewell said a teaching resource should look at the influence of the UK during its empire period and how “Britishness influenced the Commonwealth” and how local communities influenced “modern Britain”.
He added:
There is a new story about the Caribbean experience which speaks to the slave period not only being about profit and suffering but how culturally African people transformed themselves into a remodelled African/Britain.
The UN experts said the report’s “mythical representation of enslavement is an attempt to sanitise the history of the trade in enslaved Africans.
They urged the Government to ensure the “accurate reflection of historical facts”, adding: “The distortion and falsification of these historic facts may license further racism, the promotion of negative racial stereotypes, and racial discrimination.”
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
I will further look orward to the upcoming Commission’s report on Class inequality. It will be interesting to learn that Britain is now a post-Class nation, and that the poor now own all the wealth.
Unfortunately, Class doesn’t seem as media-sexy as ‘Race’.
I’m puzzled how the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, which had a number of prominent black members, could have come up with such a distorted report. Can anyone enlighten me?