• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Wednesday, May 21, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Diane Abbott blasts ‘tainted’ Prevent policy during terror bill debate

Mohamed Elmaazi by Mohamed Elmaazi
13 June 2018
in Analysis, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
169 3
A A
0
Home UK Analysis
320
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On 11 June, parliament discussed the counter-terrorism and border security bill in a Commons chamber that was almost entirely empty. The Canary counted approximately 33 MPs present during the second reading (and first debate) of the latest terror bill.

33 MPs during 2nd reading of counter terror bill

Home secretary Sajid Javid said the bill offers:

powers to tackle the evolving threat to the UK from terrorism and from hostile state activity and powers to keep the public safe and protect our national security

The only real pushback came from shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, who slammed the ineffectiveness of the government’s ‘counter-radicalisation’ strategy, known as Prevent.

The Canary has previously detailed how this bill expands on the draconian powers given by legislation such as the Terrorism Act 2000. This point was also raised by Abbott.

Expanding the law without creating new offences

Max Hill, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, offered a “cautious welcome” writing:

The CT Bill does not contain a single new terrorist offence… we have sufficient offences and do not need any more.

But the criminalisation of once perfectly lawful speech and activity is further expanded by this bill.

A growing DNA database of innocent people?

Abbott warned that the bill:

allows the retention of biometric data on anyone arrested, including DNA and fingerprints, even if they are mistakenly or even unlawfully arrested. There are already abuses of the national police database, which ​the Government have failed to correct. The state has no business keeping records on people who are not criminals.

It is an essential part of our liberty that we can go about our day-to-day lives unhindered by state agencies. That is not the case if the state can retain data on all of us. It is an even greater breach of our civil liberties if the retention is done without our knowledge.

These concerns were partially dismissed by Conservative MP Kevin Foster who said:

We would not say that details should be destroyed immediately merely because an offence was not proceeded with. I accept that this needs to be balanced with the fact that those who are wholly innocent should not think that their data will always be on a database. … Clearly, it would not be sensible to throw away potentially valuable evidence that might at a later stage allow us to proceed on an offence.

Conservative MP Eddie Hughes said:

We should celebrate …because DNA profiling is now used by 120 countries around the world, and 54 of them have DNA databases.

Prevent is a ‘tainted brand’

Successive governments have pushed the Prevent surveillance and ‘counter-radicalisation’ programme.

Abbott said the bill:

proposes extending the Prevent strategy by allowing local authorities, as well as the police, to refer people to the Prevent programme. Let me be clear that there will always be a need for a programme that does what Prevent purports to do.

I have no doubt that there is some good work being done in the name of Prevent, but Prevent as a whole is a tainted brand

Abbott then dropped a bombshell that has yet to be publicly discussed:

From a recent study by the Behavioural Insights Team, commissioned by the Home Office itself, we also know that more than 95% of deradicalisation programmes are ineffective. I suggest that those two facts—that Prevent is a tainted brand and that so many of the deradicalisation programmes are ineffective—are not unrelated.

Labour is committed to a thorough review of the Prevent programme, which we believe is currently not fit for purpose. In the interests of transparency and accurate evidence-based policy making, I call on the Home Secretary today to publish the research by the Behavioural Insights Team, which has been so widely reported and seems to run counter to the claims made for the success of these programmes.

Foster responded by saying:

We have debated Prevent. Ultimately, the motivation behind this type of behaviour does not matter.

Counter-productive

Research by the Transnational Institute suggests that counter-terrorism programmes may be harming efforts to build peace:

There is a growing consensus that laws prohibiting support to listed entities [“terrorist” groups] have contributed to a ‘shrinking space’ for those seeking to establish the conditions conducive to peace.

Furthermore, the government’s self-proclaimed ‘counter-radicalisation’ strategy – Prevent – has been repeatedly debunked even before Abbott’s bombshell revelations.

Given the rather lacklustre showing in parliament and the nearly non-existent critique in the press, any real opposition to this latest bill will have to come from the public at large.

Disclosure: The author of this article volunteers with the Campaign Against Criminalising Communities.

Get Involved!

– Write to your MP and demand they oppose the 2018 terrorism bill.

– Support independent journalism at The Canary.

– Read about the opposition to anti-democratic terrorism legislation.

Featured image and image in article via screenshots

Share128Tweet80
Previous Post

The BBC just insulted democracy with its video about Turkey’s upcoming elections

Next Post

Yet another Labour council is under fire for chopping down public trees

Next Post
South Tyneside trees campaigners

Yet another Labour council is under fire for chopping down public trees

Esther McVey

Don't believe Esther McVey. The latest employment statistics are not a success story for the DWP.

Hedgehog wild mammals under threat of extinction

One fifth of Britain's wild mammals are on the brink of extinction but there is some good news

Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May, PMQs

Jeremy Corbyn brought the house down at today's PMQs, leaving Theresa May 'absolutely fuming'

The DWP logo and a protest outside parliament by disabled people

As Brexit distracted us, the DWP released some truly horrific figures

Jeremy Corbyn
Analysis

Jeremy Corbyn suggests a new party will be in place before 2026 elections

by Ed Sykes
21 May 2025
Donald Trump tax and debt
Analysis

Trump’s tax breaks for his rich mates could add $3 trillion to US national debt

by Steve Topple
21 May 2025
Co-op Israeli products
Trending

Pressure rises on Co-op board to follow through on boycott of Israeli products

by Ed Sykes
21 May 2025
Liz Kendall dodging a question about DWP cuts
Trending

Watch as Liz Kendall scurries away from a disabled person calling out DWP cuts

by Steve Topple
21 May 2025
Liz Kendall talking about DWP PIP cuts
Analysis

Liz Kendall just lied again about how many people will be hit by DWP PIP cuts

by Steve Topple
21 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

Jeremy Corbyn
Analysis
Ed Sykes

Jeremy Corbyn suggests a new party will be in place before 2026 elections

Donald Trump tax and debt
Analysis
Steve Topple

Trump’s tax breaks for his rich mates could add $3 trillion to US national debt

Co-op Israeli products
Trending
Ed Sykes

Pressure rises on Co-op board to follow through on boycott of Israeli products

Liz Kendall dodging a question about DWP cuts
Trending
Steve Topple

Watch as Liz Kendall scurries away from a disabled person calling out DWP cuts

ADVERTISEMENT
Analysis
Nathan Spears

Vote for the Press Photograph of the Year 2024

Image by Burkard Meyendriesch from Pixabay
Feature
Nathan Spears

Why Santiago Ways is the Leading Choice for Walking the Camino de Santiago

Environment
Nathan Spears

EU elections point to growing public desire for new policymaking approach in Brussels