A former nuclear submarine commander is pleading with the government to scrap the trident nuclear missile programme. He said that getting rid of the subs from the river Clyde in Scotland would send a strong message at a time when humanity could tip “over the edge into a nuclear annihilation abyss”.
As the Sunday Herald reported:
Rob Forsyth, who commanded nuclear-armed and nuclear-powered submarines in the 1970s for the Royal Navy, now thinks that Westminster’s case for keeping Trident on the Clyde is practically, legally and morally indefensible.
This patriot – who has served at the coal face of the at-sea deterrent – is merely asking the UK’s leaders to start thinking hard about the nation’s strategic choices and introduce some bold moves. The UK would be showing true global leadership at a time when the whole of humanity could so easily topple over the edge into a nuclear annihilation abyss.
The threat doesn’t exist
Trident is no longer a weapon of last resort to be used in extreme circumstances such as defence of the homeland. Present policy includes potential first use against rogue states if they ever used chemical or biological weapons against troops in the field. The general public are not aware of this.
there is no threat that justifies such an aggressive posture at present.
And he called on the government to:
trade in our nuclear weapons as our contribution to multilateral disarmament.
Responding to Forsyth’s claims, the Ministry of Defence stated:
Our nuclear deterrent is fully compliant and compatible with our international treaty and legal obligations. The use of nuclear weapons – like all weapons – would be subject to the requirements of international humanitarian law.
Forsyth is not alone in his opinion that trident is an outdated and unnecessary policy. On 20 June, 60 activists chained themselves to the railings outside parliament. They were calling on the government to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
In response to Forsyth’s comments, SNP MSP Bill Kidd argued:
Rob Forsyth is one of a growing number of former generals and commanders of the UK’s nuclear arsenal who are calling for an end to Trident and CASD as they are inherently dangerous, wasteful of huge sums of public money and completely useless in military terms.
The struggle continues
The government shows no sign of relenting to these demands. In fact, defence secretary Gavin Williamson is calling on May to approve an extra £20bn in annual defence funding to match the proposed NHS increase.
having a nuclear deterrent is a very important part of our defence policy. It’s also an important part of being a tier-one nation and being in the UN Security Council.
The struggle goes on.
– Contact your MP if you disagree with the Trident nuclear ‘deterrent’.
Featured image via Defence Images – Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?