DWP’s £51m contract stops Citizens Advice speaking out against Universal Credit
New evidence shows that a £51m contract between the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Citizens Advice (CA) contains a gagging clause. As Universal Credit rolls out across the UK, this agreement means the UK’s leading advisory charity now can’t speak out or take “any actions” which might harm the DWP’s reputation.
Social welfare activist Frank Zola forced details of the secret agreement using a Freedom of Information (FOI) request. The response revealed that the DWP paid £39m to CA and £12m to CA Scotland (CAS). As Disability News Service (DNS) reported, the agreement means that CA in England and Scotland:
cannot take “any actions which unfairly bring or are likely to unfairly bring [DWP’s] name or reputation and/or [DWP] into disrepute”.
This evidence has huge implications. As The Canary has documented for some time, Universal Credit destroys lives. It’s already forced people to use food banks and made others homeless. CA is one of the best-placed frontline services to understand these issues. A pilot scheme for a process called “managed migration” started in July 2019. So more people than ever need CA advice, and most people assume it’s entirely independent.
As Zola noted, this evidence of a gagging clause in the contract raises “serious concerns”. The CA should exist to offer “truly independent advice and guidance”. Because as Zola also told DNS, CA exists to help and advise some of the most vulnerable people in the UK. Those “punished” by the Conservative government’s Universal Credit policy include:
disabled people and families who have ended up losing thousands of pounds by claiming UC, vast rises in debt, rent arrears, evictions, survival crime, five week delays in first payments and the horror of its inbuilt benefit sanctions and excessive conditionality.
“A pact with the devil”
Despite previous denial, CA did confirm its agreement with the DWP included the “disrepute” clause. DNS reported that it claimed this didn’t “affect Citizens Advice’s ability to publicly criticise DWP”. In a statement, CA’s chief executive Gillian Guy said there’s “nothing in the grant agreement” to prevent it from raising “evidence publicly” about the impact of universal credit.
Guy claimed CA continued to highlight “where improvements can be made to the universal credit system”. She also said:
Citizens Advice is, and always will be, totally independent from government.
Yet CA is one of the frontline organisations best placed to campaign to scrap Universal Credit entirely. Many campaigners feel that suggesting “improvements” simply doesn’t go far enough.
As activist Dr Jay Watts pointed out, it’s vital that people feel able to approach CA because it should “provide a vital service in desperate times”. Yet, as Watts continued, for it to accept this money equates to making “a pact with the devil”. It limits the CA’s “capacity to speak out against” the same policies that cause “despair” for people who seek advice.
Rick Burgess from Manchester Disabled People Against Cuts also said:
At a time when the DWP is engaged in massive and ongoing human rights abuse, for the supposed Citizens Advice organisation to be tied into a legal and financial relationship with the abusers is catastrophic for CA’s integrity and for people who need defending from the DWP, and for open democratic oversight of government policies.
It’s a bribe to stay silent.
“Grotesque government policies”
Despite the CA’s claims, this gagging clause is a massive betrayal. As Zola pointed out:
services delivered and funded by the DWP are fundamentally tainted by association to so many “grotesque government policies” and avoidable deaths.
Zola also posed a vitally important question, asking:
how this dodgy underhand multi million grant came about? Did the DWP approach Citizens Advice on an unsolicited basis and who decided the remit and scope of the UC ‘Universal Support’ service?
As the DWP pushes its devastating policies forward, this deal highlights just how far it’s prepared to go to hide the truth. That truth is literally killing people and starving children. The CA should be ashamed of itself.
Featured images via Wikimedia – UK Government / Wikimedia – Citizens Advice
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
Wow! £51 million to look the other way, does that sound like a democracy to anyone or a Fascist regime?
Considering we are in Austerity because as we were told there isn’t enough money to go around, this surely makes me think that £51 Million could have been used to help people, rather than harm them in yet another deeply despicable act of immorality by the DWP and our fascistic Tory government.
Has anyone else noticed that for well over 10 years, failed government schemes are deliberately adding to the woes of this nation, by funnelling public money through deliberately made-to-fail governmental schemes, into private coffers.
They are the greatest thefts of public money in our Nation’s Democratic history, they have increased in more recent years, and are a chilling copy of the conditions that existed just prior to both World Wars (they are also the main reason for those wars, not what most are taught in school and in the MSM).
I also wonder if like me there are others who have noticed that our government has a deliberate policy of ignoring our democratic wishes, and has deliberately introduced policies designed to kill our poorer/old/unwell/disabled/dissenting/minority groups of citizens, without it being visibly obvious, i.e. with guns.
David Cameron in particular allowed, and made the way for, 30,000+ UK citizens to be murdered in the first year of ATOS’s involvement with the DWP (a French data controlling company banned in the USA previously because of corruption and bad practices) by deliberately forcing people unfit for work back into work, knowing full well that this would likely kill them, a practice which is still claiming multiple lives daily.
Of course I ask these questions rhetorically, I know many noticed, but far too many are afraid to not just talk about it, but to arrest those responsible, and try them for mass-murder by political design.
Seriously, how can we even be called a democracy when we let these power-mad, dictatorial, democracy-hating ministers get away with the murder of thousands and thousands of UK Citizens? How can the Police, Judiciary, and our own Military sit idly by while our nation is systematically being torn to pieces by these evil people.
Our nation is NOT a democracy, it is an OLIGARCHY, but let’s be clear, even an oligarchy can be a good thing, but in our case it is as insidious as having a despotic leader, so bear this in mind…..
….Kim Jong Ill is supposed to be a despotic leader, yet he is far more honest about his country than the West generally is about theirs. North Koreans may or may not like the conditions they are in, but they know where they stand, and they know what will get them into trouble. In the West, in the UK and US particularly, we don’t. We are told we are democratic, and yet just look at the ‘storm’ that has happened over one non-enforcable vote (Brexit) that goes against the interest, not of each other, as the MSM would have us beleive, but of the corrupt oligarchs in our nations.
Most democratic peoples of the West, are almost completely blind to the fact that voting in a leader, or having a nation-wrecking referendum, is not democracy. Most are completely unaware what Democracy actually is, this in spite of the fact that most know Democracy is rulership by The People, for The People.
In a democracy, there are no leaders who can claim power for themselves over the mass of people, there are no elections to elect a leader or government to rule over themselves, though there should be multiple elections to decide what we are as a nation, and what our rules internally, and externally are. In ancient Athens, the birthplace of our modern Democracies, they didn’t have the means at their disposal to have the kind of full-on democracy we could have today. Today we are far better connected than they were, and yet they still managed to have a fairer system than we do today.
But we need specialists to carry out specific tasks, represent us on the international and intra-national scene, and whilst this is congruent with Democracy, what we have, is not that. What we have are elected leaders who immediately ignore the will of the people as soon as they get into power, and are unable, it seems, to be arrested, punished or censured for it.
Sadly this is so well known an issue, that it is a crime against Democracy and ourselves that we allow it to continue, and, that these very people have not been put in jail for their anti-democratic crimes, is a crime in itself.
There are also a lot of unelected civil servants, good people generally speaking, but some of whom have far too much undemocratic power, who get to meddle behind the scenes, undermining the elected ones, or being used by the elected-corrupt to further their undemocratic desires (surely this too should be considered, as there are many who would point out that The EU has unelected leaders too, and are specifically unhappy about that, me included).
All of it needs to be overhauled and soon. The thing is, it doesn’t matter what type of government we have (in truth there are literally, in the Entire Universe, only 3 types possible, all others are bastardizations of the first 3, and under scrutiny, boil down to one of the 3 (maybe even 2).
They are Monarchy (rulership over everyone else, by one, and one alone), Oligarchy (rulership by many over many), Democracy (rulership by all, over all). However all of those types of rulership can be good, indifferent, or bad. Hence I put it out there that any type of rulership can be good for a nation, so long as the methodology of rulership is on the whole perceived as good by those being ruled, and provably good for the nation.
In fact unless you believe in God (or Gods), the argument can be made that there are literally only 2 types of rulership in the entire Universe because the first (Monarchy) at least in Human terms, is a corruption, and cannot be achieved.
Theocracy is the only true fulfilment of the first type of rulership, as only a God could rule without the need for support from anyone else. All human ‘Monarchies’ are and were in fact Oligarchies, and even dictators who fall under the Monarchy heading, are/were in fact Oligarchs, due to their need for their power to be backed by others in order for their power to exist in the first place.
So whilst there has been much talk in terms of Communism, Democracy, Anarchy, Fascism, Socialism, Capitalism etc., over many years, the fact is that true Communism, Socialism, Anarchy, and Democracy, are to all intents and purposes, the same thing, they all focus on the need for humanity to share fairly in an environment (our Earth) that is clearly not a source of eternal abundance and wealth. Even capitalism is essentially the same thing, though capitalism can be both about collective well-being, as well as individual well-being.
I may be wrong about some of what I have written, but I am pretty sure that regardless of what type of rulership or national scheme there is, they are all potentially good, and all potentially evil, or neither evil nor good (though doing nothing, being benign in some cases could be rightly perceived under both headings).
The point, I hope that I have made is that as far as I see it (flawed as that may be), is that there are a lot of people in this nation and the World, who really do not question what it is they are being told they should believe in.
There are far too many banner waivers, when really the metrics we should all be measuring all ruler-ships/systems by, are whether they are doing more good than harm. So to bring this back onto topic, does £51 million spent on silencing Citizens Advice, instead of just being funding to help expand their services to us, sound like corrupt democracy or good democracy, or bad dictatorial fascism?
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversation
Please read our comment moderation policy here.