Once voters see through Johnson’s biggest lie yet, he’ll be history

British PM Boris Johnson
Support us and go ad-free

UK prime minister Boris Johnson has predicated his entire electoral strategy on ‘getting Brexit done’. Yet this is a deceit, because his Brexit deal will likely involve not just months but years of further negotiations.

Indeed, under Johnson, Brexit is not “oven ready“. It’s still very much stuck in the freezer. And it’s yet another lie to add to the growing list.

Flawed Brexit

Prof Michael Dougan of the University of Liverpool succinctly explains the problem with Johnson’s Brexit deal, describing it as a ‘con trick’:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Dougan also pointed out that Johnson has repeatedly rejected any extension to the Brexit transition period beyond 2020, even though it would be unlikely that all negotiations will have concluded. This could see ‘no deal’ back on the agenda.

No deal returns

Full Fact conducted a detailed analysis of Johnson’s “oven-ready” Brexit. It points out that a no-deal scenario is still very possible. And it could happen very quickly – for example:

if there is no further extension to the Brexit deadline, MPs have until 31 January 2020 to pass a withdrawal agreement. If that’s not done in time then the UK could leave the EU with no deal by default. This is still the same “no deal” scenario that’s been widely discussed over the past few years.

But even if parliament passes the Withdrawal Agreement, Full Fact argues:

While there would be a transition period in which to negotiate a future relationship with the EU, there is no guarantee that these negotiations would be successful. As we’ve already said the transition period lasts until the end of 2020, or 2022 at the very latest—after that if no future relationship deal was agreed then Great Britain’s relationship with the EU would be on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms.

And the BBC points out that non-EU trade negotiations could last for much of the next decade:

as well as negotiating with the EU, the UK would also need to sign up to a series of trade agreements round the world to replace those it has as part of the EU.

All of that could take up most of the next decade. It won’t be done when the UK leaves the EU – it will only just have begun.

Labour’s version of Brexit

Labour, however, is taking a very different approach to Brexit that could be described as ‘fast-tracked’ (if voters in a second referendum decided not to remain in the EU).

Under Labour, a Brexit deal would include:

  • “A permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union”.
  • “Close alignment with the single market”.
  • “Dynamic alignment on workers’ rights, consumer rights and environmental protections”.
  • “Continued participation in EU agencies and funding programmes”.
  • “Clear commitments on future security arrangements”.

That would mean its version of Brexit:

protects jobs, rights and the environment, avoids a hard border in Northern Ireland and protects the Good Friday Agreement and the peace process.

Corbyn exposes the lie

At a rally In Birmingham, Corbyn contrasted a Labour deal with that offered by Johnson:

If you watched the debate you’ll have heard Boris Johnson claim he’ll get Brexit done, over and over again. That claim is a fraud on the British people.

His sell-out deal will be just the beginning of years of drawn-out, bogged-down negotiations and broken promises. Three years, maybe more, according to the EU negotiator Michel Barnier. And his toxic deal with Donald Trump will take even longer.

He added:

With Labour it will be very different. We will get Brexit sorted within six months, because we’re not going to rip up our main trading relationship. We’ll secure a sensible deal that protects manufacturing and the Good Friday Agreement, and then put it to a public vote alongside the option of remaining in the EU.

No-fuss Brexit

Inclusion of a Customs Union and alignment to the Single Market in Labour’s version of Brexit renders the Irish backstop unnecessary and will mean no border between north and south of Ireland. It will also mean that months or years of negotiations over complex trade agreements will not be necessary.

According to the Independent, Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar said:

the kind of future trade deal proposed by Boris Johnson would take longer to finalise than the kind of close alignment suggested by Labour.

Ironically, therefore, a Labour version of Brexit, if approved by a confirmatory vote, will see a no-fuss deal agreed far quicker than the Johnson version. Furthermore, under Labour people will have a real choice between a “sensible deal” Brexit or remaining in the EU. It’s a no brainer.

It should now be obvious that, as with Johnson, the Tories’ Brexit deal is a total sham.

Feature image via Wikimedia 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Yes, all this is true but Labour leave voters in some areas voted as they did in 2016 because they believed their cross on the referendum paper would lead to immediate departure from the EU. They were not deluded in voting to leave, that may be a rational choice; but they were deluded in thinking departure could be accomplished in the blink of an eye. Tory in-fighting, May’s hopeless red lines and her refusal to get support from other parties, and three years of confusion and focus on arcane parliamentary procedure have left them feeling betrayed. They foolishly thought all they had to do was vote and, hey presto, we would be unhooked and sailing into bright future which looked a lot like the past. Now they won’t lose face. Not with others, but with themselves. They won’t admit they were naive and their expectations exorbitant. Thus, they veer to Johnson as a way of saying: “Look, we weren’t wrong. He will do it. We will be out in no time. We were right all along.” To embrace Labour’s position is to risk a second vote which might be remain. Then they would feel betrayed. So there will be a cohort of Labour leavers who will vote Tory; BUT, they are almost all over fifty. If the young turn out, it will weigh in the opposite scale. The vital task in the Labour seats that voted leave is to turn out the young vote. If everyone between 18 and 35 votes, Labour will win. That won’t happen, but if enough young people vote, Johnson can be deprived of his majority. Campaign amongst the young and on the day make sure they vote.

    2. What I can’t quite understand is what the difference might be between what will happen if we leave with Mr Johnson’s deal in January, or we leave with Mr Corbyn’s deal in June.

      In both cases the transition arrangements – which is what the deal are – would have to be translated into permanent arrangements.

      Unless Labour will say the negotiation of the permanent arrangements will take as long as it takes in which case we could be tied into the transitional arrangement for ever.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.