On 21 January, the Court of Appeal made a “landmark” ruling to protect one of the UK’s most discriminated minority communities. This ruling could pose a serious challenge to one of the Tories’ most chilling manifesto pledges.
Bromley Council tried to secure a five-year injunction to stop people from Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) communities stopping on public land. The High Court rejected this in May 2019. And on 21 January, the Court of Appeal ruled that GRT communities:
have an enshrined freedom not to stay in one place but to move from one place to another. An injunction which prevents them from stopping at all in a defined part of the UK comprises a potential breach of both the ECHR and the Equality Act.
This landmark case is the first of its kind brought by community group London Gypsies and Travellers. Legal experts said that this ruling also challenges the legality of similar injunctions from another “34 councils – including 14 in London”.
Debby Kennett, CEO of London Gypsies and Travellers, said:
We are extremely pleased with this result and proud to have been involved in such an important case which advances the recognition and protection of the nomadic way of life in the UK.
The judgment sets a high standard for councils seeking injunctions and stresses the need to put in place adequate and safe provision. We are keen to work with councils to explore alternatives to evictions and injunctions, such as negotiated stopping.
“A major victory”
This ruling also challenges the government’s current threat to criminalise GRT communities.
The Conservative manifesto entrenched a chilling announcement made by home secretary Priti Patel in November 2019. Johnson’s government plans to give police new powers of arrest if people stop anywhere in the UK on private or public land without prior permission. This would give police powers to seize people’s homes immediately. A summary from Friends Families and Travellers (FFT) explains that new powers intend to:
- “Make trespass a crime – resulting in prison, a fine or your vehicle being taken from you”.
- “Make it a crime for you to stop alongside or on the road”.
- “police can act” if they find “two vehicles, instead of six. A car, a trailer and a van would count as three vehicles”.
- “police can force you to go to a transit site in another county”.
- “Make it so you’re banned from an area for one year instead of three months”.
And as a 2017 report found, this affects minority groups which already face daily “pervasive prejudice and discrimination”.
Following the decision, Marc Willers QC said:
Given that finding, it is difficult to see how the government can possibly justify its proposal, which is currently out to consultation, to criminalise trespass.
Sam Grant, policy and campaigns manager at civil rights charity Liberty, also called this “a major victory” for GRT communities:
in the face of increasing hostility from local and national governments. If you’re a member of these communities, these injunctions, like the government’s proposals to criminalise trespass, are a real threat to your entire way of life.
It’s now up to the government to provide adequate safe sites for encampments to help these communities live and reduce the discrimination they face.
Not the end of the battle
This result is certainly a major victory, as several GRT campaign groups noted:
Victory for Travellers in anti-camping injunctions court case: Travellers have “enshrined freedom” to travel say judges. Ruling has serious implications for Government plans to criminalise trespass says lawyer involved with case. TT: https://t.co/Wt489g1b6C pic.twitter.com/FKkW7UkByD
— Travellers' Times (@TravellersTimes) January 21, 2020
A landmark Court of Appeal judgment released today has criticised the use of wide injunctions which target #Gypsy and #Traveller encampments. A victory for our court challenge and for Gypsies and Travellers! Read more https://t.co/AHU5BOS9bT pic.twitter.com/x4TCxk8pXz
— Gypsies&Travellers (@LondonGypsyTrav) January 21, 2020
But it’s certainly not the end of the battle. Because as Liberty pointed out, Johnson’s government “still has Gypsies, Roma and Travellers in their sights”:
Though @LondonGypsyTrav won today, the Gov still has Gypsies, Roma and Travellers in their sights
New proposed trespass powers threaten these communities and their way of life
— Liberty (@libertyhq) January 21, 2020
FFT responded in detail to a government consultation to push forward the new legislation. It noted with alarm that the government perpetuates “harmful stereotypes” which risk “fanning the flames of race hate towards Gypsies and Travellers”. In parliamentary debates, MPs have referred to Travellers as “an irritant”, “an expensive menace”, “a Traveller incursion”, and being “plagued by groups who descend on open land”. It also called on the government to challenge “this dehumanising language” rather than:
reinforcing harmful stereotypes by constantly coupling anti-social behaviour with unauthorised encampments which legitimises prejudice and discriminatory attitudes.
It now needs “as many people as possible to stand up and fight against” the government’s plans and has created a simple form. Once completed, FFT will send this to the Home Office.
The consultation closes in around 1 month. We have a NEW form to make submitting a response easier than ever.
There’s four boxes to tick and a statement to make. That’s it.
Click the link below to fill out a short form and we’ll do the rest. https://t.co/92OdA5AKhL
— FFT (@GypsyTravellers) January 17, 2020
With Johnson in power and Patel as home secretary, GRT communities face what amounts to “ethnic cleansing”. So yes, this is certainly a major legal victory; but it’s vital that everyone challenges this vicious right-wing government’s new plans.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?