The Daily Mail humiliates itself in a staggeringly moronic attempt to have the Tories’ back

The Daily Mail logo altered to read 'Daily Fail'

The Daily Mail has criticised the BBC for its Panorama programme on the government’s response to the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. More specifically, the tabloid has utterly humiliated itself by making a staggeringly moronic attempt to call the programme into doubt.


The Panorama programme was titled Has the Government Failed the NHS?. It sought to investigate “the delays and mistakes that may have put the lives of NHS staff at risk” amid the pandemic. As the BBC explained, it made a number of key revelations:

That the billion plus items of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) that the government has supplied included cleaning products and individually counted gloves. …

That gowns, visors, swabs and body bags were not included in the pandemic stockpile.

It also revealed that the government took “steps to remove Covid-19 from the High Consequence Infectious Diseases (HCID) list” on the same day it downgraded PPE guidance. Meanwhile, the programme pointed out that there are 21 million ‘missing’ FFP3 respirator masks; because 33 million of them were “specified” in a stockpile list but the government has only distributed 12m.

The Mail‘s attack

The programme also spoke to healthcare workers. As the broadcaster noted in a response to criticism:

More than 100 NHS and other healthcare workers are known to have died with Covid-19 to date.

Read on...

So it wanted to include “the personal experiences of doctors and nurses who are risking their lives to treat Covid-19”.

The Daily Mail, however, had a different take on the situation. Its article on the programme, written by Guy Adams, ran with the headline:

How WAS flagship BBC show infiltrated by the Left? When Panorama turned its guns on the PPE crisis, five medics savaged the Tories’ approach. Yet they ALL had Labour links

Adams then proceeded to list the interviewees and effectively ‘out’ them as Labour ‘infiltrators’. One, Adams said, was “an outspoken supporter of Jeremy Corbyn” who attempted to become “a council and parliamentary candidate”. Another played a key role in a “Left-wing lobby group that campaigns against billing migrants for NHS care”. And on and on he went.

You reap what you sow

At one point in the tirade, Adams asked the question:

Why couldn’t the BBC find a doctor or nurse to speak to who didn’t have a long track record of Labour activism?

The BBC has provided its own answer to this, saying:

Some NHS Trusts have discouraged health care workers from discussing the lack of PPE. So it is perhaps not surprising that those willing to speak out are more involved with campaigning around the NHS.

But there’s another explanation that’s best illustrated by rephrasing Adams’s question: why couldn’t the BBC find a doctor or nurse eager to defend the Conservatives after the party has systematically destroyed the health service over the last ten years? Or put into a more immediate context: why couldn’t the BBC find a doctor or nurse willing to defend the Conservatives’ record after the party left them on the frontline without protection against a highly infectious disease? Perhaps simply the question of ‘why are many doctors and nurses prone to Labour and activism?’ would suffice. A big part of the answer to that, of course, can be found in the preceding two rephrased questions.


The problem with the Mail‘s article doesn’t just rest in its inability to see how moronic its central gripe with the programme is, though. The fact it thought that characterising Labour supporters as ‘infiltrators’ rather than, say, people holding a legitimate political position, is also pretty damning.

The designation speaks volumes about how the tabloid views Britain’s political landscape and the general public.

Also, as academic Justin Schlosberg told The Canary, the Daily Mail‘s reaction to the BBC‘s exposé reveals much about the current state of the British media. Because in this particular instance, the BBC was ‘doing its job’, i.e. holding the government to account, which isn’t often the case in terms of the public broadcaster. But Schlosberg said “it immediately induces flak [for doing so], not as much from the government but astonishingly from other media, other right-wing media”. And he stressed:

On the rare occasion where journalists at the BBC do what should be just a matter of routine journalism, that is calling the government to account for its gross failures in the handling of the pandemic, it is just seen as an aberration.

In short, there are ‘infiltrators’ featured in the British media. But they’re not the doctors and nurses who go public to reveal what our government is doing. They’re those who work in the industry and dedicate their time to propping up the Conservatives and the status quo, instead of holding power to account on behalf of the public – which is meant to be their actual job.

Featured image via Kerry-Anne Mendoza

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Put a rabid dog up for election as a Tory and the Daily Fail would support it!

      What a shame that the MSM here and around the western world has become such a joke. My problem with it is that the British public who actually spend cash on buying these rags seem very willing to be told by them what to do and what to do because lets face it the billionaire owners of the Daily Fail and all the others only have our interests at heart don’t they ?????

    2. These Tories are rabid greedy capitalists & care only about money not people. In light of the Cygnus report they were given what did Killer Johnson do? He went off in March on a12 day holiday with his bimbo to Chequers after sanctioning Cheltenham races & while Greece got stuck in with confronting the pandemic. Result: UKania will have the highest death rate in Europe & Greece one of the lowest.
      Compare the outcome of CV19 & the Black Death in 1348 on when ?40% died. Remember, when out rinf your bell & shout UNCLEAN as you go !

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.