63 Jewish people make complaint over charity funding ‘activities in contravention of international humanitarian laws’

Gaza bombing 2014
Eliza Egret

63 Jewish people, including comedian and writer Alexei Sayle, have lodged a formal complaint against a charity. They argue that the Jewish National Fund UK (JNF UK) has funded activities that violate international humanitarian laws, including the 2014 military assault on Gaza. The signatories state that the charity misleads the public in its fundraising material and breaches fundraising codes.

Michael Kalmanovitz is one of the signatories. He is part of the International Jewish anti-Zionist Network UK, an organisation which co-founded a campaign called Stop The JNF. He told The Canary:

The Jewish National Fund (JNF), founded in 1901, is now key to Israeli apartheid. Through the Israel Land Authority, the JNF controls 93% of state land exclusively for persons of “Jewish nationality“, “in perpetuity“, in other words, permanently excluding Palestinian people from land that has been either bought under false pretences or stolen from them.

Planting trees to cover ethnic cleansing

JNF UK claims to be “Britain’s oldest Israel charity“, and “every penny raised by JNF UK is sent to a project in Israel.” The charity gives people an “exciting opportunity” to plants trees in Israel to mark special occasions, such as births. This is ironic given the JNF actively plants forests over the remains of ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages.

Kalmanovitz said:

The JNF’s forests and parks, including the British Park, have been planted and built on the ruins of hundreds of destroyed and depopulated Palestinian villages, in an attempt to (literally) cover up all traces of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Notoriously, in 1967 after the ‘six-day war‘ the JNF boasted, “the JNF tractor follows in the wake of the army tank”.

Forcibly displacing Bedouin communities

JNF UK’s current focus is to pour money into projects in the “impoverished” Negev region, which makes up 60% of Israel’s land. The JNF’s Blueprint Negev has a goal of relocating 500,000 people to the region.

In their complaint to the Fundraising Regulator, the 63 Jewish campaigners argue that:

JNF UK’s involvement in the Negev is political and aimed at forcibly displacing its Bedouin population, one of the most neglected and poorest communities in the region.

The Negev’s Bedouin population has inhabited the region for thousands of years. But when the Zionist state of Israel was established in 1948, most Bedouin people were forced off their land, and many became refugees in Jordan, the Sinai, Gaza, and the West Bank.

Despite JNF UK’s claim that the Negev is now “largely unpopulated“, there are currently around 230,000 Palestinian Bedouin people living in the region. Around 150,000 of this population live in 37 villages which aren’t recognised by the Israeli state. Residents have few rights and aren’t even provided with sewage systems, electricity, or water. The Israeli state continually attempts to displace people by demolishing their homes.

The Negev community of al-Araqib was first displaced in 1951. Residents returned to their land in 1998, fearing that the JNF was going to plant a forest over the land and erase the community off the map for good. The residents continue to remain steadfast. Their village has been destroyed by the Israeli state 176 times. Each time, the villagers rebuild.

Complicity in war crimes

JNF UK also funds Derech Eretz, an organisation which provides pre and military preparation programmes to young Israeli people in the Negev, ensuring that they will “excel in the military”. Derech Eretz also provides duty support and mentorship for their graduates serving in the military, as well as post-military programmes.

Furthermore, JNF UK’s 2015 accounts reveal that the charity spent £114,000 on the 2014 “Gaza war effort.”. This is the same “war effort” in which Israel committed war crimes.

The signatories of the complaint comment that the:

Charity Commission apparently considers contributing to the Israeli army’s actions in Gaza, to come within the framework of a charitable act that serves the public good. We make this point on the assumption that the JNF UK’s annual accounts have been audited by the Charity Commission as part of its regulatory responsibility.

“Apartheid is not a charity”

The signatories are requesting that the Fundraising Regulator investigates JNF UK. Kalmanovitz stated:

Activists are campaigning in a number of countries to de-register the JNF as a charity: apartheid is not a charity.

The Canary contacted both JNF UK and the Fundraising Regulator for comment. JNF did not reply at the time of writing, the Fundraising Regulator said: “We are unable to comment on individual cases while they are open.”

Featured image via B’TSelem/Wikimedia Commons


We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The Charity Commission is in effect shielding the JNF UK. How about this sentence sent to someone who challenged the charitable status of the JNF UK: ” In simple terms, the test for charitable status is a test of what a charity was set up to do, not what it does in practice.” The writer identified himself as a Charity Commission “Case manager/Regulatory compliance”.

      Stop the JNF is an international campaign worth joining. The court of public opinion matters and where people united lead, elites can be obliged to follow.

      Thanks to Eliza Egret and The Canary for this piece.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.