Victorious Marc Wadsworth pins the blame for Jewish Chronicle smears on Labour

Marc Wadsworth outside the High Court
Support us and go ad-free

Black journalist, activist, and former Labour Party member Marc Wadsworth has just won a court case against the Jewish Chronicle (JC). But the story is merely a symptom of the illness. Because Wadsworth believes the ultimate blame lies with Labour itself.

Marc Wadsworth

Wadsworth is a civil rights campaigner, journalist, broadcaster, author, and lecturer. He founded the Black-led Anti-Racist Alliance in 1991, Europe’s largest movement of its kind, and is the editor of citizen journalism website The Latest. In March, the JC claimed he was involved with a group that:

set up an “anti-Zionist action network” to discover the addresses of Jewish Labour activists and “take care of those individuals”…

The Labour in Exile Network (LIEN) vowed to unearth the “identity, location, activities and associations” of Jewish activists from the campaign group Labour Against Antisemitism (LAAS).

The JC stated that Wadsworth spoke at LIEN’s online launch event. But none of its claims about him were true.

Fabricating stories

As a press release from his lawyers, Carter-Ruck, stated:

Mr Wadsworth had never been involved in or supported the appalling activities alleged by the article. Nor had he been a member of or involved with the group to which the article referred, or attended its launch event.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Wadsworth took the JC to court, and On 22 July, he won his case. The JC had already admitted the story was wrong, published an apology, and agreed to pay Wadsworth damages.

Grovelling

The JC‘s apology read:

In our issue of 12 March, we reported that Marc Wadsworth had spoken at the launch event for the ‘Labour in Exile Network’ (LIEN), a group that aimed to discover the addresses of Jewish Labour activists to “take care” of them, and that he was thereby complicit in a conspiracy to intimidate, threaten or harass Jewish activists into silence. We also suggested that there were reasonable grounds to suspect that such activities were criminal. Our story was wrong. Mr Wadsworth did not speak or even attend the online event. Mr Wadsworth is not a member of LIEN and we accept that he has not been involved in any of the group’s activities. We apologise to Mr Wadsworth for our error and have agreed to pay damages to him.

A long line of misdemeanours

But as SKWAWKBOX reported, this is not the first time the JC has lost legal a legal case. It noted that Wadsworth’s case was:

the latest in a string of untrue claims for which the Chronicle has had to pay damages and/or apologise – including significant compensation for a ‘litany of lies’ against Liverpool pensioner Audrey White, accusations of antisemitism against a Muslim woman councillor and ‘utterly untrue’ allegations of terrorism against a Palestinian aid charity. The paper was also heavily criticised by ‘regulator’ IPSO for its articles about Ms White and for its failure to cooperate with IPSO’s investigation.

Smearing Labour members

LIEN also had something to say about the piece. The JC claimed that LIEN:

vowed to unearth the “identity, location, activities and associations” of Jewish activists from the campaign group Labour Against Antisemitism (LAAS).

The announcement came during the online launch event for LIEN

It also noted that:

The group said it would target the Jewish members in order to take “action against the individuals”, referring to them as “Zionist trolls”.

Details of the “anti-Zionist action network” were posted on its website.

“Factual errors and misleading references”

LIEN said in a counter-argument that:

  1. The Labour In Exile Network has not launched any campaign or working group as you describe. No such “announcement” was made at our launch conference, which any number of the 200 participants will be able to confirm.
  2. In the run up to conference, a single individual made a proposal to set up a working group called ‘Anti-Zionist Action Network’. However, as clearly stated on our website “we did not get to this item in the agenda, which was deferred”. The video footage from our Zoom conference can prove this.
  3. The LIEN steering committee, elected at the conference, decided against launching such a network.
  4. The half sentence “take care of those individuals” has been misinterpreted in bad faith, as the whole sentence shows: “to use the knowledge so-gained for the purpose of warning other members to take care of those individuals” in the sense of “be wary and avoid”.

The statement added that LIEN:

abhors all forms of racism, including antisemitism and campaigns against the conflation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

Jackie Walker implicated

The JC also implicated Black Jewish activist Jackie Walker in its article. But LIEN said:

Using a photo of Jackie Walker suggests to readers she was instrumental in the story you have published. [She] has no connection at all to this and we ask you remove her photo immediately.

Labour: turning Wadsworth into a “media target”

While Wadsworth is pleased with the verdict, he believes that the Labour Party is ultimately to blame for the story. He told The Canary:

The Labour Party turned me into a media target by unjustly expelling me in 2018. I have had to endure trial by media since the party suspended me in 2016. My #Justice4Marc reinstatement campaign has received huge support since, including from Jewish people and many others. I am an ally of Jews, Palestinians and all other oppressed people and will defend my reputation as a life-long anti-racist campaigner against any media that libels me, as I have done successfully in this instance. The witch hunt against the Labour left, accelerated by the current leadership, must be halted by any means necessary. I am very grateful for the huge amount of support I’ve received on social media since the JC public apology in court yesterday.

Bigger than just the JC

There are still questions that need answering. Not least is where the JC got its incorrect information about Wadsworth from. Also, given this is one of numerous cases where the JC has either lied or put out false information about people, should the Independent Press Standards Organisation take more action against it?

The story gets to the heart of the current situation in the Labour Party too. In an attempt to first destroy Jeremy Corbyn, and then his legacy as Labour leader, the party machinery is doing everything it can to purge left-wing members from its wings. And while from the outside this may look like an internal battle, in the case of people like Wadsworth the implications of a world away from the Labour Party can be devastating.

It’s a victory that the JC has apologised. But the battle against the demonisation of people with left-wing views continues regardless.

Featured image via Susan Simpson 

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. It’s good to see the JC being brought to book for once. Their stories are frequently repeated by the MSM but rarely challenged. It’ll be interesting to see how much coverage this court victory will get.

    2. I can confirm, as a member of LIEN’s Steering Committee, that when the proposal for an “anti-Zionist action network” was first made I opposed it, as did other members of the Steering Committee. It got nowhere but in any event it was no different from a Zionist mapping project which did target dozens of Palestine solidarity activists including where they lived.

      This furore is utterly synthetic. It is the Zionists and their targetting of anti-Zionists which is the real issue. I myself have been targeted by a mixture of far-Right Zionists and neo-Nazis

      1. The main problem is conflating anti-Zionism and anti-Jew. This was made clear during the Corbyn smear campaign by the media but most outlets totally ignored the very clear distinction.
        I also dislike the use of anti-Semitic because Semitic was highjacked years ago by Zionists to mean Jewish.

    3. As one who has also suffered the lies and smears of the Israel lobby, I’m pleased that the mendacious JC has been brought to book. I will never forgive them for their part in wrecking the one chance of a socialist government in my lifetime.

    4. The JC is merely a mouthpiece for the ideology of “the new anti-Semitism”. To grasp what this is you need to read the Perlmutters, or at least what Norman Finkelstein explains about them in Beyond Chutzpah. It is as Uriel Tal, erstwhile professor of Modern Jewish History at Tel Aviv University pointed out: “The bitter cries of anti-Semitism which allegedly raises its head again all over the world serve to cover up the fact that what is disintegrating in the world is Israel’s position, not Jewry’s. The charges of anti-Semitism aim only to inflame the Israeli public, to inculcate hatred and fanaticism, to cultivate paranoid obsession as if the whole world is persecuting us and that all the other people in the world are contaminated while only we are pure and untarnished.”
      The hatred, fanaticism and paranoia come from the followers of Herzl. Their smearing everyone who disagrees with them as anti-Semitic is wearing thin and will soon be so threadbare it will shred. Meanwhile BDS gives Israel a real headache: it can murder Palestinians and bomb Gaza, but it can’t bomb students on American or European campuses, which is why it must spread the lie they are racists. The JC will go on pushing the Herzl-follower line, libelling and being forced to retract and pay compensation because it is a puppet. Its inveterate lying is an attempt at “facts on the ground”. But it doesn’t work. Israel is trying to impose itself on world opinion like it imposed itself in Palestine, through lies and violence. The task is impossible. Small victory by small victory Israel’s racism and oppression will be defeated.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.