Parliament will finally debate PIP and how the DWP manages it. MPs must be there.
A petition over Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a benefit from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), has sparked a parliamentary debate. It’s a surprising development, because the petition didn’t reach the 100,000 signatures usually required for this. However, it presents as an opportunity for MPs and claimants to publicise the huge problems with PIP.
PIP: dogged by controversy
PIP is a benefit for chronically ill, sick and disabled people. It’s supposed to help with the extra costs of living with illnesses or impairments. As the Canary reported in November 2022, Keely Santos set up a petition calling on the government to conduct a “full review” of the PIP application process. It said that the benefit’s:
application and assessment process is inhumane and degrading. We believe Capita and Atos are not fit for purpose to be contracted as independent assessors, and that this leads to many people being unfairly denied benefits.
PIP has been dogged by controversy. From stealth real-terms cuts to huge rates of successful appeals, the benefit is a shambles. Also, between April 2013 and 30 April 2018, around 12 disabled/chronically ill people a day died waiting for the DWP’s decision on their applications.
DWP: mismanagement
Then there’s the DWP’s assessment process for PIP, which has been unfit for purpose for years. Independent Assessment Services (IAS), formally ATOS, is the company that does PIP health assessments for the DWP. However, this area of the benefit has been a mess, too. Official probes have shown “dishonest” assessment reports and high rates of appeal wins.
Plus, more and more people are complaining to the independent government watchdog about PIP – namely over:
- The assessment process.
- Assessors’ interpretation of medical evidence.
- Payment delays.
- DWP “misadvice”.
The DWP’s management of PIP has been such a disaster that it prompted the UN to say PIP had effectively reduced the number of people who should have been entitled to health-related benefits, negatively impacting on people’s living standards.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeA debate that MPs must attend
So, Santos’s petition is asking the government to address all of that.
The petition also noted the high number of claimant appeals over DWP PIP decisions. Figures for July-September 2022 show that 68% of tribunals went in the claimants’ favour. They also reveal that the number of people appealing a decision in the first place went up by 119% year-on-year.
Overall, PIP is a mess. Now, thanks to Santos, parliament will debate the state of the benefit and how the DWP manages it.
The debate will take place on Monday 4 September. The Canary is encouraging everyone affected by PIP, or the DWP, to write to their MP. They should ask them to attend the debate on their behalf. You can do this via email using the Write To Them website here.
Featured image via Maurice – Wikimedia, resized to 770×403 under licence CC BY 2.0, and Wikimedia
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Parliament will finally debate PIP and how the DWP manages it. MPs must be there.
NO good asking our Tory M.P. to turn up he will be their anywhere has he is a Govt WHIP now under Sunak he will not speak up for us Pendle-Colne residents in H.O.Com debate on this Tory Govt scam he possibly or may have voted YES too in the first place to get it passed in parliament.
**
I have a Tory M.P. called Andrew Stephenson of Pendle-Colne area of Lancashire
That has trashed our area of Lancashire for the last 13+years.
HE no longer Petersen us resident in Colne any more in Govt
He blocks us from his tweets if we disagree with him or Tory Govt policy
He blocks us resident for having face to face in person meeting with him
He blocks us BY Not replying to our emails.
***
So, voter in my area of Lancashire have had all they are going to take form our Pendle-Colne Tory M.P. come next G.E. he will pay a big price for not looking after us residents.
***
His Tory Cllr mate paid the price in May 2023 local area seat election they lost their seats now it time for our useless M.P. of Pendle-Colne TO GO!!
***
He may hide in London away from Colne resident problems
But next G.E. vote he cannot hide away from the way we will vote
Unless he standdown NOW has our Pendle-Colne Tory M.P. and re stand before next G.E. for another area he could try Manchester area were he come from to Colne.
***
Before we in Colne residents took him and his family in round here and looked after them so tell us Mr Stephenson why have you tuned on us Colne resident now is it just to keep you job in Govt you may lose next G.E. anywhere if we DO-NOT vote for you Sir in Pendle vote.