Parliamentary select committee denounces Carillion’s ‘greed on stilts’

Frank Field Work and Pensions select committee Carillion
Support us and go ad-free

Two parliamentary select committees have strongly condemned Carillion for paying themselves bonuses at the expense of shareholders, workers, and suppliers. The chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, Frank Field MP, has denounced the behaviour of Carillion’s board as:

greed on stilts, pure and simple.

The chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) select committee, Rachel Reeves MP said:

Carillion bosses were focussed on their own pay packets rather than their obligation to address the company’s deteriorating balance sheets. While these directors could still walk off with bonuses intact, workers were left fearing for their jobs and suppliers faced ruin.

Carillion directors concerned only with pay and bonuses

These statements strongly reinforce the criticisms of Amra Balic, head of stewardship at BlackRock, that Carillion’s board was more concerned with:

how to remunerate executives rather than what was going on with the business.

The BEIS select committee also commented on Carillion’s “notorious reputation” for late payments to suppliers. Reeves said that, while suppliers waited, Carillion directors:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

were doing their upmost [sic] to ensure there was no impediment to their receipt of fat pay and bonuses.

Weak clawback provisions

Both parliamentary select committees have criticised the Carillion Remuneration Committee (RemCo) for weak clawback provisions of bonuses and salaries. Alison Horner, chair of RemCo, testified before the committees that Carillion followed legal and remuneration advice. Yet the company’s remuneration advisers, Deloitte, denied that they ever provided such advice.

When RemCo first considered clawback for payments made from February 2015 onwards, it ruled out extending it beyond a handful of directors. Shareholders, including BlackRock, wanted to limit the level of bonuses paid to directors in 2016. Despite shareholder dissatisfaction with Carillion’s remuneration for senior managers, RemCo sought “to increase the maximum annual bonus opportunity” to 150%.

RemCo did consider asking directors to return their bonuses from 2016, but only after the weak provisions and restrictions they had already agreed prevented this. Deloitte’s advice to Carillion on clawback in September 2017 noted that the already weak provisions didn’t allow any of the bonuses paid in cash to be clawed back at all.

Reeves said:

Finally, when even the Carillion RemCo considered asking for directors to return their bonuses, the system and culture was so dysfunctional, and the terms and clawback provisions so weak, that even this meek step was ruled out.

Both select committees state that they have not seen any evidence to suggest that any further attempts were made to return cash from bonuses to the business.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed