Children and taxpayers at risk from academies, says report

Support us and go ad-free

On 30 March, the Public Accounts Committee published a report that raises concerns about academy trusts. These concerns include trustee salaries, accountability and transparency, the safeguarding of public funds and assets, and asbestos in schools. You can read the full report here.

The committee reported that academy trusts are educating more than two million children and handling large amounts of public money. If these trusts fail, the cost to pupils and taxpayers is high. The report concluded that it is:

crucial that they show the highest standards of governance, accountability and financial management.

Trusts falling short of high standards

But the committee was critical of how academy trusts are “falling short of these standards”. Also, it said the Department for Education (DfE) has been “too slow to react”.

The committee welcomed the publication of the first academies sector annual report and accounts. This is a step towards improving transparency and accountability. Yet the committee was critical of the fact that it took nearly 14 months after the end of the academies’ financial year to publish the annual report and accounts. The committee’s report concluded that the DfE needs to produce these annual reports and accounts more quickly. In this way, parliament and parents will be better able to hold the academy trusts and the DfE to account.

Committee chair Meg Hillier MP commented:

If parents, Parliament and others are to hold them properly to account, it is vital they have timely access to transparent and detailed information. Academies and the trusts that run them must be judged against the standards expected of other schools funded by the taxpayer.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Weak rules and lack of detailed analysis

The report concluded that the DfE’s rules are “too weak to prevent abuse”. The committee recommended that the department should tighten the rules. In addition, the annual reports and accounts should contain more detailed analysis.

Excessive salaries

The committee was also critical of excessive trustee salaries. Hillier said:

Excessive trustee salaries deprive the frontline of vital funds and it is alarming that, in two-thirds of cases where Government has challenged individual trusts on pay exceeding £150,000, it has not been satisfied by the response.

The report concluded that the department should challenge all academy trusts that are paying excessive salaries and take action where these cannot be justified. The department should also update the committee on the results of this work.

Needs to do more to protect public funds and assets 

The report was critical of the DfE for not doing enough to identify or intervene with academy trusts in financial difficulty. As a result, the committee asked the DfE to explain how it will protect funds and assets should a trust fail and gave it a deadline of the end of June.

Asbestos in schools

But the most troubling finding in the report is that the DfE does not have enough information about the extent of asbestos in school buildings to ensure that the risks are being properly managed.

Asbestos is a significant and potentially dangerous problem in many schools. The DfE’s latest survey is currently taking place and promises to provide more information on the presence and management of asbestos. The DfE accepted that information on asbestos in schools should be available to parents and local communities. The committee asked the DfE to provide this information by the end of June.

Featured Image via Wikimedia Commons/ClemRutter

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed