Explainer: What’s the difference between Johnson’s Brexit deal and May’s deal?
Depending on who’s talking, the Brexit deal Boris Johnson negotiated with the EU ranges from being vastly different to his predecessor Theresa May’s deal, to being almost exactly the same.
To sort fact from fiction, the House of Commons library has produced a report.
It says that “only two Articles in the main Withdrawal Agreement have changed from the November 2018 text, and the changes are minor”.


What about the backstop?
The report says the main differences are in the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, or the backstop as it is commonly known.
Read on...
According to the report, Mr Johnson’s deal “contains very different arrangements, the UK will no longer be in a single customs territory or union with the EU”.
But Northern Ireland will still be in the UK’s customs territory and VAT area, meaning it will align with the EU’s rules in these areas.
“Northern Ireland will remain mostly aligned to the EU’s regulations for goods. Four years after the end of the transition period, Northern Ireland’s democratic institutions will vote on whether they wish to continue the arrangements in the Protocol,” the paper says.
Under the new Protocol, if the UK and EU are unable to conclude a new future relationship agreement by the end of the transition period, an open border will be able to be maintained between Northern Ireland and Ireland.


Is there still a divorce payment?
Yes. There are no changes to the previous financial settlement in the agreement reached between Johnson’s government and the EU.
It’s estimated the settlement will cost the UK £33 billion by the time its final payment has been made, potentially in the mid-2060s. Any estimates of the cost are uncertain.
Amongst the underlying principles of the financial settlement are that no EU member state should pay more or receive less because of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the UK should pay its share of the commitments taken during its membership.
What about the level playing field?
Annex 4 of the previous Protocol – which contained references to EU laws and international conventions that would apply to the whole of UK in what were called “level playing field” commitments – has now been removed.
According to the House of Commons library report:
These were put in by the EU to limit the UK’s capacity to gain what it would see as an unfair advantage by lowering standards.
This was of particular concern due to the UK’s close geographical proximity to the EU, but also in the previous ‘backstop’ the UK would have been in a Single Customs Territory with the EU, and so the EU wouldn’t be able to use tariffs to compensate for competitive advantage.
The level playing field provisions were in the areas of taxation, environmental protection, labour standards, state aid and competition.
These have now been replaced by less specific and non-binding commitments in the Political Declaration to uphold such principles in any future trade agreement between the EU and the UK.
General secretary of the TUC Frances O’Grady said the new proposals “do nothing to protect or improve workers’ rights, now or in the future”:
These proposals are entirely based on process rather than substance. A rehash of the flimsy offer Theresa May’s govt made in March. They do nothing to protect or improve workers’ rights, now or in the future. 2/
— Frances O'Grady (@FrancesOGrady) October 19, 2019
Govt suggesting it will consult on unfair dismissal and TUPE (which would already be weakened the morning after we leave the EU) is meaningless – it’s not a commitment to implementing the changes working people need. 4/
— Frances O'Grady (@FrancesOGrady) October 19, 2019
And as for relying on the Queen’s Speech as evidence that it supports workers’ rights – all the QS contained was vague, ineffectual commitments and woolly promises. The govt said nothing that would change the game for working people (or challenge big business). 5/
— Frances O'Grady (@FrancesOGrady) October 19, 2019
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.