Labour members push for system change to end right-wing political dominance

Make Votes Matter protest outside parliament on 14 December
Support us and go ad-free

A new poll shows that 76% of Labour Party members now believe the party should back calls for a more proportional electoral system. Only 12% disagreed.

Britain’s current voting system is ‘First Past the Post’ (FPTP). This election saw the Conservatives get around 43% of votes but about 56% of all MPs. Labour (and other parties), meanwhile, would have won more seats in a more proportional system. In fact, as Joe Sousek from the Labour Campaign for Electoral Reform pointed out:

In 19 out of the last 20 general elections, most people have voted for parties to the left of the Conservatives. Yet the Tories have been in power for 63% of this time – and this will climb to 66% if they see out their new term in full. It’s time for Labour to recognise that First Past the Post has done nothing to create an equal society.

“We need to commit 100% to electoral reform”

Make Votes Matter (MVM) campaigns for a system of Proportional Representation (PR) in UK general elections. This means “any voting system in which the share of seats a party wins matches the share of votes it receives”. MVM commissioned the poll of Labour members.

As Labour MP Clive Lewis said:

Most people voted for parties to the left of the Conservatives on Thursday – so with Proportional Representation we’d most likely have a coalition of progressive parties steering us away from austerity and a hard Brexit cliff edge.

Instead, we’ve ended up with probably the most right wing government this country has ever seen, elected by a minority of voters, with devastating consequences for the most vulnerable in our society. Most Labour members have understood this danger for some time, and it’s absurd that we as a party still haven’t backed a fair system. We need to commit 100% to electoral reform at next year’s Labour conference, and we have to make sure this can never happen again.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Most Labour candidates already supported PR before the 2019 election.

FPTP’s right-wing bias

MVM co-founder Klina Jordan previously spoke to The Canary about PR. She said there’s significant evidence that the system is fairer for voters (and parties). It also “results in better social, environmental, and economic outcomes”. Countries with such a voting system, meanwhile, tend to be more equal societies with better representation of minority communities. And it even results in less war.

A report from earlier in 2019 that MVM co-authored also stressed that the FPTP electoral system has “a pronounced conservative bias”. And the report’s author explained that it “consistently skews politics to the right and drives up economic and social inequality”. In “countries with more proportional systems”, meanwhile, the report insisted that there are more “egalitarian, compassionate” outcomes.

FPTP is leaving voters “out in the cold”

On 14 December, MVM staged a protest in London. This highlighted the problems with Britain’s current electoral system. And as Jordan insisted:

The quirks of our outdated voting system mean that Parliament won’t accurately represent how people voted, which is desperately damaging to our democracy because the last time one party had a majority of support from the people was in 1931.

If you want to put a stop to unfair votes and finally make votes matter, support the growing demand for Proportional Representation by signing our petition to #ChangeTheVotingSystem! …

Millions of people face the prospect of being left out in the cold when it comes to being represented in Parliament; that’s because we need a proportional system where seats match votes, and all votes must count equally

The above petition already has more than 50,000 signatures.

Featured image via Joseph Casey (with permission)

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. And under PR we wouldn’t now have people castigating Corbyn as a disaster and the manifesto as a dog’s breakfast; we would be patting him on the back as he entered Downing Street and calling the manifesto terrific. That’s why those in the Party going for Corbyn’s liver are attacking the wrong target: it’s the archaic voting system which denied us what we voted for. The Tory, Brexit Party and Ulster Unionist vote was 14,987,111. The combined vote of the left of centre parties 16,553,954. Johnson would be PM only if the Lib Dems backed him.
      How did the Tories win? It seems Johnson spent quite some time in those constituencies principally in the north where his majority was forged (no pun intended). What was offered to voters on the ground? A quick exit from the EU of course; but were they told also that if they voted Tory money would come to their constituency? Nothing against the rules, but it’s unscrupulous because if such an offer is being made during a GE campaign, everyone should know about it. Perhaps some enterprising investigative journalist should do a little digging.

    2. Serial losers indulge in 5 yearly whine system doesn’t work for them.

      In related news, water is wet.

      There is no shadowy right wing conspiracy, no hidden forces keeping you down, you aren’t imbued with specially clear sight, you are internet fantasist rationalising away another crushing defeat with more tin foil hat thinking.

      You lost because people think left far left wing policies are a joke. Why, because they always fail, everywhere, all the time.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.