Rail workers vote to continue strike action against South Western Railway regarding safety concerns

Ed Sykes

Workers on South Western Railway (SWR) have voted to continue taking strike action in the long-running dispute over keeping guards on trains. Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union backed more walkouts by 416, with 88 voting against.

A bigger majority voted to take other forms of industrial action – the sixth time the union has balloted its members on SWR over the issue because of industrial action legislation. The turnout was 59%, well above the legal threshold for industrial action ballots. The union has held dozens of strikes over the past two years, including 27 in December and on New Year’s Day.

“The interests of passengers and workers”

The RMT decision comes amid further calls to bring SWR back into public ownership:

In a statement, the RMT said the government had “sought to blame railway workers taking strike action in defence of safety for the failures of the private companies”. It continued:

The government committed itself to pushing Driver Only Operation, which has been attacked by disability groups as a barrier to accessibility, and attacking civil liberties by forcing workers to run services during strikes.

As RMT general secretary Mick Cash argued:

This government is acting like a puppet for the rail companies, throwing good public money after bad and trying to breathe life into the rotting corpse of privatised rail.

Instead of dreaming up new ways to subsidise private sector profits by attacking civil liberties, he should stop pushing cost-cutting driver only operation and bring SWR into public ownership, running it in the interests of passengers and workers not his mates in the City.

Featured image and additional content via Press Association

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us