Britain First leader Paul Golding charged under the Terrorism Act
The leader of far-right political group Britain First has been charged with an offence under the Terrorism Act after refusing to give police access to his phone.
Paul Golding was stopped at Heathrow Airport in October on his way back from a trip to the Russian Parliament in Moscow by officers from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command.
He refused to give the pin codes for a number of his electronic devices.
Golding was later charged with refusing to comply with a duty under Schedule 7 of the act.
In a statement, Golding said he was not a terrorist and described the charges as “an abuse of legislation”.
Schedule 7 allows police to interrogate, search and detain anyone for up to six hours at UK ports without any suspicion that a person is involved in terrorism.
And while many people may not feel much sympathy with Golding, Schedule 7 is often abused and misused. As the Network for Police Monitoring pointed out:
Read on...
Repulsive as Golding is to most people, the law allowing for the arrest and prosecution of people on a terrorism charge for refusing to give the police access to their phone is open to massive abuses of state power. It needs abolishing https://t.co/xRsdzU0guv
— Netpol (@netpol) February 21, 2020
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
An invasion of privacy by the State certainly.
What was he doing in Russia??
Trust isn’t the issue here.
No one is really innocent is a upsetting viewpoint in realizing one one may be guilty of it..