‘Disturbing’ police proposals a ‘step back to the 1980s’ for abuse survivors

Support us and go ad-free

Campaigners have hit out at proposals that may change the way police approach victims in investigations, describing the recommendations as a “step right back to the 1980s”.

A report by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) into the Metropolitan Police’s handling of Operation Midland said the “conflict between the wishes of survivors and the need for impartial investigations should be reconciled”.

Recommendations include changing guidance for police officers on the “concept of belief” of a survivor, to make clear that once a crime has been recorded, “any investigation should be conducted impartially to establish the truth”.

Inspectors said there is a “fine balance” between the need to take victims seriously and the need for “thorough, impartial investigations”, but it is “critically important to guard against regression” given the police’s track record on crime recording.

Sarah Green, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, told the PA news agency: “It’s beyond belief that the police inspectorate would choose this point in time, when prosecution numbers of rape are the lowest on record, to recommend drastic changes on police codes and practice in believing rape victims when they report.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“Telling police that they should take steps to act in an unusual way around rape and specifically not indicate that they believe the victim is a step right back to the 1980s.

“It implies there is an unusual likelihood in rape of false allegations, when in fact they are very rare.”

Rape cases ‘being dropped prematurely’
(Posed by models) A rape victim is interviewed by a police officer in a specialist rape clinic (Gareth Fuller/PA)

Harriet Wistrich, director of the Centre for Women’s Justice, said the report’s recommendations “are most disturbing at a time when we are facing a crisis in the criminal justice system in respect of the investigation and prosecution of rape”.

She told PA: “Essentially, because one man made a series of allegations against high-profile individuals which were believed by police officers, all rape victims are to face further hurdles in the process to hold rapists to account.

“False allegations are very few and far between, but criminal justice failures in the investigation and prosecution of rape are far too commonplace.

“The messaging in this report is the last thing we need when rape is virtually decriminalised.”

The “presumption of belief” in rape cases was introduced in order to encourage more victims to come forward to report, she said, warning: “Even now, only an estimated 15% of rapes are reported, of which only one in 65 of those allegations reported result in a charging decision.

“Women are already declining to proceed with rape complaints when they feel they are treated as suspects and required to hand over the contents of their mobile phones and other personal data.

“The progress made in encouraging women to come forward will almost certainly go into reverse if women are not treated like all other people reporting crimes as acting in good faith.

John Worboys prison release
Harriet Wistrich, solicitor for two of black cab rapist John Worboys’ victims and Rachel Krys, co-director of End Violence Against Women, speak at a press conference in central London in relation to judges granting an appeal against the release of John Worboys (Rick Findler/PA)

“There was an outcry when it was discovered that John Worboys was able to drug and rape over 100 women and remain undetected.

“This was mostly because the police failed to believe the accounts of the 10 women who came forward to report him and therefore did not adequately investigate the allegations.”

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us