Unfair lender tactics putting firms off emergency loans, MPs warn

Support us and go ad-free

Small firms are being put off taking out government-backed emergency coronavirus loans due to unfair tactics being used by some lenders, the chair of the Business Select Committee has warned.

Rachel Reeves has written to the chancellor on behalf of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee outlining concerns over the way lenders are “interpreting” the emergency loan scheme.

In the letter to Rishi Sunak, she said there were worries that some lenders were choosing to push their own financial products before the emergency loans, while others are seeking to apply high interest rates once the interest rate-free initial period ends.

Labour Party conference 2016
Rachel Reeves chairs the Business Select Committee (Danny Lawson/PA)

It came to light last week that many big lenders were demanding that business owners give personal guarantees that could see their assets being seized, though some have since U-turned on this decision or are waiving this for loans up to £250,000.

Reeves also cautioned that the application process for the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) is “cumbersome” for small firms in desperate need, while some lenders are being slow to approach the British Business Bank to access the finance.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

She has called on UK banks to “play their part” in helping hard-hit businesses and wants Sunak to clarify the terms and conditions of the scheme.

She said: “The chancellor’s loan scheme is very welcome and necessary but a number of businesses are coming forward with concerns.

“Giving clearer guidance to lenders so they can ensure SMEs get the right loan to help them through this crisis and encouraging lenders to look for alternatives to personal guarantees will be important in ensuring CBILS delivers for businesses up and down the country.”

She added: “Banks were kept afloat by government and taxpayers during the financial crisis – I would urge them to play their part in helping small and medium-sized businesses through this crisis.”

The coronavirus loans scheme is designed to offer companies up to £5 million interest free for the first year to help shore up their businesses.

The government has pledged to underwrite 80% of the risk of the bank loans as an incentive for banks to lend to firms in difficulty.

Banking giant Barclays was last week forced to backtrack over demands for personal guarantees on the loans – up to £250,000 – after outcry.

HSBC also said it did not require personal guarantees for loans up to £250,000, but reviews the terms of larger loans on a customer-by-customer basis.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I was reading about Rachel Reeves just yesterday. It was a comment of hers from six years ago, when as Shadow Employment Minister she said Labour would be tougher on the unemployed than the Tories. She said all long-term unemployed will be forced to take jobs. But they already do that, have done for years. But that’s one way for slavery to start again, they’ve just called it another name. If people are forced to do it you don’t have to provide proper pay and conditions, and the threat of destitution is the whip across your back.

      Blair’s New Labour introduced Workfare macht Frei. Can’t get more totalitarian than forced labour. Some believe Blair’s fortune came from his government’s involvement with the Private Finance Initiative to build hospitals and schools, but I believe most of it comes from deferred kickbacks from each “cohort” (Alistair Darling’s words) who were forced onto Workfare. If he was paid just £50 per worker, and with 2 million people forced through the scheme, that would have earned £100 million. Sounds about right.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.