Unfair lender tactics putting firms off emergency loans, MPs warn
Small firms are being put off taking out government-backed emergency coronavirus loans due to unfair tactics being used by some lenders, the chair of the Business Select Committee has warned.
Rachel Reeves has written to the chancellor on behalf of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee outlining concerns over the way lenders are “interpreting” the emergency loan scheme.
In the letter to Rishi Sunak, she said there were worries that some lenders were choosing to push their own financial products before the emergency loans, while others are seeking to apply high interest rates once the interest rate-free initial period ends.
It came to light last week that many big lenders were demanding that business owners give personal guarantees that could see their assets being seized, though some have since U-turned on this decision or are waiving this for loans up to £250,000.
Reeves also cautioned that the application process for the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) is “cumbersome” for small firms in desperate need, while some lenders are being slow to approach the British Business Bank to access the finance.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeShe has called on UK banks to “play their part” in helping hard-hit businesses and wants Sunak to clarify the terms and conditions of the scheme.
She said: “The chancellor’s loan scheme is very welcome and necessary but a number of businesses are coming forward with concerns.
“Giving clearer guidance to lenders so they can ensure SMEs get the right loan to help them through this crisis and encouraging lenders to look for alternatives to personal guarantees will be important in ensuring CBILS delivers for businesses up and down the country.”
She added: “Banks were kept afloat by government and taxpayers during the financial crisis – I would urge them to play their part in helping small and medium-sized businesses through this crisis.”
The coronavirus loans scheme is designed to offer companies up to £5 million interest free for the first year to help shore up their businesses.
The government has pledged to underwrite 80% of the risk of the bank loans as an incentive for banks to lend to firms in difficulty.
Banking giant Barclays was last week forced to backtrack over demands for personal guarantees on the loans – up to £250,000 – after outcry.
HSBC also said it did not require personal guarantees for loans up to £250,000, but reviews the terms of larger loans on a customer-by-customer basis.
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Wouldn’t trust her either whots are end in all of this a blairite in a red tie
I was reading about Rachel Reeves just yesterday. It was a comment of hers from six years ago, when as Shadow Employment Minister she said Labour would be tougher on the unemployed than the Tories. She said all long-term unemployed will be forced to take jobs. But they already do that, have done for years. But that’s one way for slavery to start again, they’ve just called it another name. If people are forced to do it you don’t have to provide proper pay and conditions, and the threat of destitution is the whip across your back.
Blair’s New Labour introduced Workfare macht Frei. Can’t get more totalitarian than forced labour. Some believe Blair’s fortune came from his government’s involvement with the Private Finance Initiative to build hospitals and schools, but I believe most of it comes from deferred kickbacks from each “cohort” (Alistair Darling’s words) who were forced onto Workfare. If he was paid just £50 per worker, and with 2 million people forced through the scheme, that would have earned £100 million. Sounds about right.