Privacy concerns remain over contact-tracing app, Amnesty International UK says

Support us and go ad-free

The UK public’s right to privacy could become “another casualty” of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic through the use of a contact-tracing app, Amnesty International UK has warned.

The government is to begin testing its coronavirus contact-tracing app on the Isle of Wight this week. It uses Bluetooth to track and trace contact between users – alerting people if someone they interacted with has displayed symptoms or tested positive for the virus.

However, privacy concerns have been raised over the centralised approach the NHS app takes – which sees contact data from app users shared with the NHS and a central database if a user declares they have symptoms.

NHSX, the app’s developer, has insisted the NHS and the app asks only for the first half of a user’s postcode, all data in the app is anonymous and does not leave a user’s phone until they volunteer to share it with the NHS.

However, Amnesty International UK director Kate Allen said the government should be looking at decentralised app models – where contact-tracing data stays on a user’s device.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“We’re extremely concerned that the Government may be planning to route private data through a central database, opening the door to pervasive state surveillance and privacy infringement, with potentially discriminatory effects,” she said.

“Ministers should instead be examining decentralised, privacy-preserving models such as those many European governments are pursuing.

“In these extraordinary times, contact-tracing apps and other technology could potentially be useful tools in responding to Covid-19, but our privacy and rights must not become another casualty of the virus.

“Contact-tracing apps must always be voluntary and without incentives or penalties.”

The app trial being run on the Isle of Wight is voluntary, although NHS chiefs and the government have urged residents to download the app in order to improve its impact.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Dear Canary ,
      One of the things about the latest generation smartphones has been the inclusion of a ‘fingerprint’ reader , supposedly to speed up access to the machine and prevent misuse after theft . For at least a century the police have maintained fingerprint databases for the discovery of the identities of persons at a crime scene . Because of the reliance on this data and its possible misuse there are safeguards in place controlling how and when these fingerprints can be retained , however all sorts of trusting people are passing them to completely unregulated US Corporations for whatever purpose they choose . It strikes me as madness
      Derek

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.