Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
Fears of Labour Leaks whitewash as Corbyn ally Jennie Formby ‘steps aside’ as general secretary
Jennie Formby has stood down as Labour’s general secretary amid a period of upheaval and scandal in the Labour Party. And some now fear a whitewash of the Labour Leaks scandal may be on the cards.
Formby, Corbyn and Labour Leaks
A close ally of former leader Jeremy Corbyn, Formby stressed as she resigned that:
When I applied for the role of general secretary in 2018 it was because I wanted to support Jeremy Corbyn, who inspired so many people to get involved in politics with his message of hope, equality and peace.
Corbyn and his parliamentary allies quickly praised Formby’s “courage” and “commitment” during her time in the role.
As general secretary, Formby faced pressure from the right of the party to undertake numerous controversial suspensions of left-wingers, some of which went forward.
The resignation comes as Labour investigates the Labour Leaks scandal, which revealed right-wing efforts in the party to undermine Corbyn’s leadership and election efforts. The leaked report also exposed racism and discrimination targeting Corbyn allies.
The battle for the soul of the party continues
A Labour Party source has reportedly told the SKWAWKBOX that new leader Keir Starmer “knew he wanted Jennie gone and raised it with her the night he won the election”. They also claimed that:
Read on...
There was an agreement weeks ago for her to resign and [Starmer] wanted [Formby] gone before the NEC elections for fear the left might unite and win the slate, making it harder to install his choice – which is still Emilie Oldknow.
According to the SKWAWKBOX, another Labour source believes “the committee set up to investigate Labour Leaks is full of people friendly to Emilie”. The outlet said Starmer’s office had “declined to comment” on the above quotes.
As Novara Media co-founder Aaron Bastani has reported, Oldknow was allegedly “Team Starmer’s favoured candidate” to take over from Formby. But she “was implicated in the Labour leaks scandal”.
Bastani and others now fear the investigation into the Labour Leaks scandal could result in a whitewash:
NEW: Labour’s NEC weren’t given names of those being proposed to head up internal investigation into leaks before meeting, so they had no time to do checks.
Basic due diligence not happening. Hardly a good start – and something you wouldn’t see in any healthy organisation.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) May 1, 2020
After everything that's happened inside Labour, and revelations in leaked report, why would anyone assume "due dilligence had been done"? https://t.co/WmncarFXwu
— FiveFilters.org ⏳ (@fivefilters) May 1, 2020
Fair to say @TheLadyWilcox is a rather factional choice to investigate the revelations surrounding the leaked Labour report.
Basic professionalism around this appears entirely impossible. pic.twitter.com/s9wVpklq5A
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) May 1, 2020
Just unbelievable. The idea of bouncing an NEC into having an individual like this investigate organisational failures of historic mangnitude is just astonishing.
A really rotten political culture. pic.twitter.com/oMySEJ0OpW
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) May 1, 2020
Confirmed that Lord Dubs was suggested as member of the panel to investigate leaked Labour report. Sensible given claim dealing with anti-semitism in party was stifled under former party management – and Lord Dubs is Jewish.
The right of the NEC voted against it.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) May 1, 2020
Wow.
Keir Starmer voted AGAINST the appointment of Lord Dubbs, the only Jewish person proposed for the independent #LabourReport investigation.
That is not a good look considering it is a report on antisemitism. What kind of message does this send to Jewish people? https://t.co/zOEufFaLdm
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) May 1, 2020
One thing is clear: the battle for the soul of the Labour Party is far from over.
Featured image via Labour Party, with additional material via Press Association
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop
Fund us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Looks pretty over to me.
There’d be space in the GPEW for Corbyn and Momentum.
It isn’t “a battle for the soul of the Labour Party”. The right are not interested in soul, only the body. When they get control, soul disappears.
So glad I’ve left. The issue now is ‘do I vote Labour in 2024’? I know the arguments about abstaining. ‘letting the tories in’ etc etc.
But no way am I going to be taken for granted as a hitherto non-swing voter; no way am I voting for the present bunch; no way am I voting for a Party that doesn’t challenge the establishment, is inconsistent in handling complaints and whose leading members are offering no opposition whatsoever in many ways.
Some have said “Starmer is playing a long game”. Rubbish. There is no time to think of ‘long games’. We effectively have bribery, corruption and lack of democracy in Parliament NOW.
Socialism or no vote.