Gap between rich and poor university students widest for 12 years

The Canary

The gap between poor students and their more affluent peers attending university has widened to its largest point for 12 years, according to data published by the Department for Education (DfE).

Better-off pupils are significantly more likely to go to university than their more disadvantaged peers. And the gap between the two groups – 18.8 percentage points – is the widest it’s been since 2006/07.

Differences by region and ethnicity

The latest statistics show that 26.3% of pupils eligible for FSMs went on to university in 2018/19, compared with 45.1% of those who did not receive free meals. Only 12.7% of white British males who were eligible for FSMs went to university by the age of 19. The progression rate has fallen slightly for the first time since 2011/12, according to the DfE analysis.

But the government’s Widening Participation in Higher Education report reveals significant regional differences across England in the likelihood of getting university places.

Almost half (49%) of FSM pupils in inner London go to university by the age of 19. This is higher than non-FSM pupils anywhere outside London.

Moreover, fewer than a fifth of FSM pupils attend higher education in some areas of England – including in the South West (17.2%), South East (17.7%) and the East Midlands (18.3%).

Progression rates have risen for all ethnic groups in the latest year except for Black pupils – where they’ve dropped for the first time in a decade from 59.9% in 2017/18 to 59.1% in 2018/19, the report found.

Black pupils are still the least likely ethnic group to progress into higher tariff universities at 9.8% in 2018/19, although this rate has more than doubled since 2009/10.

“We must redouble our efforts”

The figures come after an education minister called on universities to do more to raise standards in schools and ensure that students from all backgrounds “get to the finish line” on a degree that leads to a graduate job.

Universities minister Michelle Donelan said it was “far too simplistic” to only look at the number of students from a disadvantaged group going into higher education to measure progress.

Julie McCulloch, director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders, said:

More disadvantaged children are going to higher education than ever before but unfortunately these statistics show that progress on this front has stalled over the past three years, while the proportion from more affluent homes has continued to rise. This is why the gap has widened.

We must redouble our efforts to make participation in higher education more equitable and this is a job for us all, not just universities.

We have to tackle educational gaps early in life through more investment in high-quality early- years education, ensure that our schools and colleges are sufficiently funded, and improve the way in which we support the schools which serve our most deprived communities. This must happen if the Government is serious about ‘levelling up’.

DfE reponse

A DfE spokesperson said:

We must ensure that all those who have the ability, attainment and desire to pursue higher education are given high-quality options that will lead to the good graduate jobs that will transform their lives.

The Universities Minister recently called for institutions to do even more to raise standards and aspiration in schools, such as through sponsoring schools, running summer camps and appointing student ambassadors.

The Education Secretary has also set out his intention to fundamentally reform technical education, to level up opportunity across the nation for those who do not go to university.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us