Fear of ‘Covid in the courtroom’ halts Julian Assange case
The extradition case against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been brought to a halt at the Old Bailey over fear of “Covid in the courtroom”.
District Judge Vanessa Baraitser stopped proceedings on the fourth day of hearings, as it emerged that a lawyer for the US Government may have been exposed to the virus and was being tested.
Speaking in court, Edward Fitzgerald QC, for Assange, told the judge: “We respectfully submit we have to go with the assumption (the lawyer) has Covid.
“If that is the correct assumption it has consequences – firstly we should not be here today because Covid will be in the courtroom.
“Court staff themselves would be at risk and you yourself may well be at risk.
Read on...
“Finally, our client Mr Assange, who is vulnerable you are aware, would be at risk in court.”
Other members of the US Government legal team, who appeared by video link as a precaution, joined calls for the case to be adjourned until Monday.
Agreeing to the request, Judge Baraitser said: “Last night I was informed that one of the barristers in the case may have been exposed to the virus.
“I am told the testing process will be known at some time tomorrow.
“Whilst the situation is uncertain the hearing should be adjourned until the outcome is known.”
If the test is positive for Covid-19, the judge asked for submissions from all parties on what to do next.
Assange is fighting extradition to the US following the leak of hundreds of thousands of classified documents in 2010 and 2011 exposing alleged war crimes and abuse.
The 49-year-old, who has been in high-security Belmarsh Prison for 16 months, is facing 18 charges, including plotting to hack computers and conspiring to obtain and disclose national defence information.
The allegations include that Assange conspired with army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to crack a scrambled password, known as a “hash”, to a classified US Department of Defence computer.
Assange is also accused over the publication of unredacted documents containing the names of sources, which it is claimed put lives at risk.
His defence claim the prosecution under the Donald Trump administration has been politically motivated. And campaigners argue that his extradition is an attack on press freedom. A letter from lawyers calling for the extradition proceedings to be dropped stated:
The extradition to the US of a publisher and journalist, for engaging in journalistic activities while in Europe,
would set a very dangerous precedent.”
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Every journalist- those worthy of the label – should be up in arms! The silence from the UK’s MSM suggests that journalism in the UK, thus access to political information, thus democracy is (are) in a very dark place! Let’s not pretend otherwise!
“Fear of ‘Covid in the courtroom’ halts Julian Assange case”
…or…
Fear of poorly performing prosecution stopped dead by UK counsel feigning *ahem* Covid *ahem* to tag in a freshly briefed stooge.
There. Fixed it for you.
A cursory read of Craig Murray’s daily attendance will tell anyone that it isn’t going well. But when has that ever mattered with a judge on a 96% conviction rate?
I also note that NO UK media noticed that Reporters Without Borders and Amnesty International (with around 40 other interested parties) were booted from the remote viewing “for fear of disruption”. If this had happened in Belarus, Ukraine or Russia – the MSM would be all over it.