Courts head apologises after Black barrister mistaken for defendant three times in a day

Support us and go ad-free

The acting head of the UK’s court service has apologised after a Black barrister was mistaken for a defendant three times in one day.

Alexandra Wilson, a criminal and family barrister and author of In Black And White, tweeted that she was “absolutely exhausted” after staff at the court repeatedly failed to recognise she worked in the legal profession.

Her tweets quickly went viral, drawing accusations of racism within the UK’s court system.

Kevin Sadler, the acting chief executive of Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service apologised to Wilson and said it was “totally unacceptable behaviour” and he would be investigating the role of his staff in the incident.

Wilson said when she arrived at court on Wednesday the security officer first asked for her name so he could find it on the list of defendants.

“I explained I was a barrister. He apologised and guided me through security,” she said.

“At this point I tried to shrug it off as an innocent mistake.”

After meeting with her client, she then tried to enter the courtroom to discuss the case with the prosecutor.

She said: “At the door a member of the public told me not to go into the courtroom. I asked why and she said because it’s a court, only lawyers can go in. She said I was a journalist.

“The usher (the one person who recognised I was a barrister today) said to ignore her and to head on in.

“As I opened the door, a solicitor/barrister said I needed to wait outside court and said the usher (who, btw, was next to me) would come outside and sign me in and the court would call me in for my case. I explained I’m a barrister. She looked embarrassed and said “oh. I see.

“She turned back around and I walked towards the prosecutor, ready to have our conversation. Before I got there the clerk, VERY loudly, told me to leave the courtroom and said the usher would be out shortly. Before I could respond she then asked if I was represented.

“I, AGAIN, explained that I am a defence barrister trying to speak to the prosecutor. She looked at me, said “oh right, ok” and continued with what she was doing.”

Following the incidents, Wilson said she has lodged a formal complaint: “This really isn’t ok though. I don’t expect to have to constantly justify my existence at work.”

Sadler responded to Wilson’s twitter thread and said: “I’m investigating the role of my staff and contractors as a matter of urgency. This is not the behaviour anyone should expect and certainly does not reflect our values.”

It comes after official figures revealed people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds are less likely to be successful when applying to become a judge, and only 9% are senior barristers.

Last week a Ministry of Justice report found BAME people “over-represented in applications for judicial appointment” but are “less likely to be successful”.

Industry leaders have called for the legal profession to diversify to better represent the public.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Racism and sexism are endemic. A black woman? Much more likely to be a criminal than a lawyer. We really need to dismiss utterly the notion of race and to educate from the nursery upwards that birth-attributed gender is a biological difference not a cultural distinction. We ae still in the Dark Ages.

    2. The prejudice was expressed in such a casual fashion that the perpetrators would probably be horrified to be accused of the ‘institutional racism’ that the whole episode reflects. Unfortunately ‘equal opportunities’, ‘anti-racism’ and every other ‘anti-‘ we inherited from the 1970s is merely a fashion accessory in modern Britain (UKania). People do not want to be viewed as ‘racist’ and that is all they want.

    3. This shows the positive effects of breaking “glass ceilings” – to break even unconcious biasses and prejudices (In contrast to the cynical uses of this by folk such as Clinton or other amoral female neoliberals). Its good she didn’t accept it and reported it virally. Matters must change.

      On a side note, regarding: “It comes after official figures revealed people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) backgrounds are less likely to be successful when applying to become a judge, and only 9% are senior barristers.”

      Are 9% of all BAMEs really senior barristers? 🙂

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.