Face coverings in secondary schools will not be compulsory, says minister

Support us and go ad-free

Face coverings and asymptomatic coronavirus (Covid-19) tests in secondary schools will not be compulsory when pupils in England return to class next month, the schools minister has confirmed.

Not compulsory

Nick Gibb acknowledged that it’s “more challenging” to teach with face masks, but he said wearing face coverings is “highly recommended”.

He appealed to parents to allow their secondary school-age children to take part in regular voluntary rapid coronavirus tests when classrooms reopen from March 8.

He told Times Radio:

Of course we can’t make it mandatory on parents but we just hope that most parents will see the wisdom of testing their children twice a week.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Over the first two weeks of term, secondary school and college pupils will be asked to take three coronavirus tests on site and one at home. They will then be sent home-testing kits to do twice-weekly.

Asked whether it should be a case of “no test, no school”, Gibb told LBC radio:

No, we want to make sure it is not compulsory in that sense, and they will need the permission of the parents.

In all these things, it is a balance of risk and just having anybody tested, frankly, and identifying asymptomatic cases is a bonus in terms of minimising the risk.

He said he hopes the vast majority of students will volunteer to use the lateral flow tests.

Primary schools

Primary school children will not need to take a rapid coronavirus test when they return to class.

On face coverings, Gibb told LBC:

It is more challenging to teach where you have masks on the children and on the teachers, but we have a new variant of this virus which is far more transmissible than the previous variant.

Asked on BBC Breakfast whether secondary school pupils will have to wear face coverings, he said:

We are saying it is not mandatory for schools to have masks in classrooms but it is highly recommended because we want to do everything we can to reduce the risk of transmission in the school.


His comments come after the National Deaf Children’s Society warned that the government’s recommendation for face coverings to be worn could have a “devastating” effect on youngsters with hearing difficulties.

The Department for Education (DfE) has said teachers should continue to be sensitive to the additional needs of their students, such as deafness, in deciding whether it’s appropriate to wear a face covering.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. A dire mess, but I feel relieved for some teenagers that if they are forced to attend school and the consequences are on their parents there is the option to not wear a mask. I hear enough adults talking about dermatological problems and scarring from it that has worsened since the mask wearing, and I remember what school was like having that tie stuck on for seven hours along with the appalling heating. Extended mask wearing must be driving some people cranky. It does matter – enough kids will be developing eating disorders and other problems like this that may last a lifetime as result of a culture of poor mental health literacy and so many pychotic ideas having been normalised in the west for decades before the pandemic could comlicate things further. It’s crazy that the schools are going back, and saddening to hear parents where I live just sounding relieved and deferential to a government they still bizarrely trust, but I’m glad within the mess of policy there is some freedom even if a by-product the wrong reasons.

      I have recently been sawing a plastic that has quite a stink to it when sawn. This wasn’t abated the second time, when I used a mask of the kind many of us have been using in the supermarkets at least. I live alone, spend all my time alone and am not in work, and glad of this making me low risk to myself and others, I’m now only wearing a mask in shops for a quiet life, because they are obviously totally useless.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.