Suspended and expelled members win victory over Labour in the courts

A wooden gavel

10:30, 26 February 2021 CORRECTION: The original article mistakenly said one group, Labour Activists For Justice, was bringing a case. In fact, there are two groups: Labour Activists For Justice (LA4J) and The Left Legal Fighting Fund (LLFF), supporting six and two claimants respectively. The recent hearing reported here saw the judge allow two claimants supported by LLFF to join the claim filed by LA4J in December. We apologise for this error, which has been corrected in the article below.

Labour members expelled or suspended over antisemitism allegations will have their day in court, a judge has ruled. The decision to take the cases to a full hearing came on Wednesday 24 February after resistance from Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.

Speaking about his victory at the High Court, journalist Sameh Habeeb said:

I joined the Labour Party after I came to the UK as a refugee from Gaza. I thought it shared my values, but the Party has let me down. I’ve been suspended for over two years and have been gagged from responding to constant attacks on my character.

I never wanted to take my own Party to court, but there was no other way to get justice. This legal action has the potential to set a new legal precedent about how Labour treats its members, which would prevent others in my position from being subjected to this gross unfairness.

Co-claimant, Alma Yaniv said:

The Labour Party suspended me nearly two years ago. Since then, I’ve been left in limbo, unable to properly respond to the allegations that have been levelled against me.

Read on...

Rather than resolving our cases as quickly as possible, it seems to me that the Party is simply trying to cause more unnecessary delays. Labour has treated pro-Palestine members with contempt. At last, with this court process, we have a chance of achieving justice.

Two groups are bringing cases against Labour. Yaniv and Habeeb are supported by the Left Legal Fighting Fund.

Another group, known as Labour Activists For Justice, represents six other members and includes:

an 80-year-old Jewish woman twice accused of antisemitism by the party, a long-standing Jewish trade unionist and a retired Jewish professor.

According to Swawkbox, the party argued against eight similar cases being taken forward together as one and had wanted a preliminary hearing which the members felt would “have substantially delayed matters and increased costs”.

The complainants reportedly wanted to combine the cases:

in the interests of the most economic and speedy resolution of the case

The Left Legal Fighting Fund, set up to support members who’ve been expelled or suspended, tweeted about the victory:

We can reveal that the Fighting Fund won a major victory against @UKLabour at the High Court this afternoon. The Party suffered a double defeat and the judge awarded costs to our side. This was an important first step in a wider legal battle.

Supporters of the group celebrated the news:

Skwawkbox said that the new decision was a step forward for those accused:

The victory is a significant boost for those fighting Labour’s assault on member rights and freedom of speech since Keir Starmer took over the leadership.

Others seemed to think it was a signal example of the current leadership style.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons/Joe Gratz

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Bearing in mind the party machine that actively undermined their electoral chances, all those who have quit the party should sue for their party subs back. Starmer would have to get the Israeli embassy to bail him out.

    2. Who does this Starmer think he is? Who died and made him a god? What gives him the right to stop people speaking up in favour of Jeremy? OI! STARMER! JEREMY CORBYN IS WORTH A HUNDRED OF YOU ANY DAY OF THE WEEK! WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? LOCK ME UP? GO ON THEN! COME & HAVE A GO IF YOU THINK YOU ARE HARD ENOUGH! I DARE YOU! I DOUBLE DARE YOU! I TRIPLE DARE YOU! YOU DON’T HAVE THE BOTTLE! I COULD TAKE WTH BOTH HANDS TIED BEHIND MY BACK! I SPIT ON YOUR SHOES!

    3. Socially abusing someone’s character with slander/lies is the new torture.
      The worst thing about the Communist Domination of Eastern Europe was no one could speak out to the cosmos in hopes of hearing another.
      All voices had to be censored in ancient days to compliment the leader’s social adgenda/view of the world as in the conflict between Galileo, and the Church over the gravity of the observation.
      Easy to spot the continuity here of power keening.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.