Trial date set for four accused of damaging Colston statue

The Canary

A trial date has been set for four people charged with criminal damage in relation to the toppling of a statue of slave trader Edward Colston.

The bronze memorial to the 17th century slave merchant was pulled down during a Black Lives Matter protest on 7 June  last year, before being dumped in Bristol Harbour and later recovered by Bristol City Council.

Charges allege that the four defendants, without lawful excuse, jointly and with others, damaged the statue of Edward Colston, a listed monument belonging to Bristol City Council.

It is claimed that the defendants committed the offence “intending to destroy or damage such property or being reckless as to whether such property would be destroyed or damaged”.

All four defendants pleaded not guilty to the charge against them during the hearing at Bristol Crown Court.

Judge Peter Blair QC, the recorder of Bristol, said he would preside over a trial of the case.

He told the defendants: “You have pleaded not guilty and therefore I am fixing a trial date of December 13 for you which you must attend without fail on that day and the subsequent days.

“We estimate that it will go into a second week. I am suggesting probably setting aside seven to eight days so you need to make sure that your diaries are so arranged.

“There will be a hearing on November 8 to take stock of the case and make sure that everyone is working successfully towards your trial date.

“You don’t have to attend but you may attend if you wish. Your counsel may attend by video link.

“You are on unconditional bail and that will continue, so you are free to leave.”

Ahead of the hearing, the legal firm representing three of the four defendants released a statement.

Raj Chada, head of criminal defence, and Laura O’Brien, associate, at London-based law firm Hodge Jones & Allen, said they would fight the charges “vigorously”.

“We are committed to defending them and their right to a fair trial in this important case. We ask that their privacy is respected,” they said.

The next hearing in the case will take place on November 8 at Bristol Crown Court.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. We know what’s going to happen if the outcome of this trial doesn’t show perspective and understanding of why this was done and why both despite and because of the history there was joy in the act that most right-thinking people shared. It’ll be interesting to see what is deemed more important, making an example of a few people with precedent in mind or escalating a situation to the point where a physical demonstration that some woukd obiviously call a riot was inevitable and right.

      It is the English establishment on trial and we the jury are watching.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.