In November 2020,The Canary reported that EHA Exploration Limited applied to drill for petroleum around the shores of Lough Neagh. Located in the north of Ireland, Lough Neagh is the largest freshwater lake in the UK. It’s also where the north gets 40% of its drinking water.
Environment activists opposed this plan to drill. And on 13 October 2020, the north’s Assembly agreed to place a “moratorium on onshore petroleum licensing and drilling”. Environmental campaigners also demanded that the minister for the economy “immediately legislate to end petroleum licencing”.
However, since October last year, the plan to drill around Lough Neagh appears to be showing some signs of movement. That’s because the Department for the Economy (DfE) commissioned Hatch Regeneris to carry out:
independent research into the economic, environmental and social impacts of onshore petroleum exploration
Hatch Generis has worked on a variety of mining and energy projects worldwide. An anti-drill campaign group told The Canary it has concerns that all stakeholders aren’t being consulted in this research. The group is also concerned that the research doesn’t specifically look into health. Campaigners told The Canary this research process is due to end on Friday 19 March.
Anti-drill campaigners said:
Serious concerns emerging. It appears that FIVE councils under proposed PLA1/16 are still not involved in stakeholder consultation with @HatchRegeneris @belfastcc @MidUlster_DC and @lisburnccc have passed motions rejecting industry.
— Stop The Drill (@StopTheDrill) March 11, 2021
Lack of consultation?
The Canary contacted local councils. Only three were able to respond by the time of publication. Mid Ulster Council said:
The Council was consulted by the Department and the link to the relevant Planning Committee meeting in June 2019 is below.
But it later added:
we haven’t been contacted by or been in contact with Hatch Regeneris on this or any other issue and we don’t appear to have had any further contact with or from the Department on the granting or otherwise of a licence.
Belfast City Council said:
In relation to fossil fuel extraction, Councillors agreed a motion in October 2020 to write to the relevant government ministers in relation to plans around exploratory licences.
The motion also called upon the NI Executive to place an immediate ban on all petroleum licensing and to deny permitted development rights to any company seeking to prospect for oil and/or gas.
Lisburn & Castlereagh City Council said it:
has been included in a consultation process regarding the proposed drilling at Lough Neagh.
But it didn’t provide any detail as to what that “consultation process” involved.
When asked why it appeared to be proceeding with this petroleum licencing process despite the Assembly’s October decision, DfE told The Canary:
While the motion of 13 October 2020 is non-binding, the Department is very conscious of the fact that there was cross-party support for the introduction of a moratorium on petroleum licensing for exploration, drilling or extraction of hydrocarbons in Northern Ireland.
There’s no legal obligation to consult while considering a petroleum licence application. However, DfE says:
in the interests of openness and transparency DfE has notified relevant organisations…that it has accepted Petroleum Licence Application PLA1/16 as a valid application and invited them to make representations.
It also told The Canary:
As part of an initial review of petroleum licensing policy the Department recognised that there was a lack of existing information on the Northern Ireland specific impacts of petroleum licencing. Therefore independent research into the economic, environmental and social impacts [emphasis added] of onshore petroleum exploration was commissioned. The contract was awarded to Hatch Regeneris following an open procurement process.
We need a “full investigation”
The highlighted section above seems to confirm that the research doesn’t appear to specifically address the impact of petroleum drilling on health. Meanwhile, campaigners are calling for:
A full investigation into the process
Featured image via Pixabay – 466654
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?